this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
609 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: Meta is beta testing advanced AI features on Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses. Beta testers in the US can opt-in for early access to features like camera aided visual translation/summarization of text and asking any questions related to the image or topic within a certain period of time. Meta plans to make it available to everyone next year.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Once again

If a friend starts wearing these around, I will hang out with them a lot less. If at all

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What about all of the smart securicams all over the place these days? Those are just as much of a privacy risk.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, they really aren’t, because they’re at a fixed location and are all monitored by different mega corporations.

The closest thing is Ring doorbells, and even those are only located at people’s doors.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

And they sell the data from them as a secondary revenue stream. Not just Ring doorbells, too: IoT security cameras are all over Shodan.

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I got these before I cared about privacy. Wish I didn’t.

[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Wdym, you got one of them and you‘ve been enjoying it, but don’t like the potential privacy implications?

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What have you been mostly using them for if I may ask? And how much do you use them in general?

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For privacy reasons (and also because it's winter :p) I no longer use them that much, but when I did use them they were mostly show-offs. I also had to be really careful not to get them wet because of how expensive they are. They also aren't that comfortable

[–] SecretPancake@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So even without the privacy concerns they are not worth it after all.

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 1 points 11 months ago
[–] doctorn@r.nf 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"I see a wooden sculpture of the state of California..."

Walks into wall

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apart from all the important critique: "...creating a beautiful and modern decorative piece" Seriously? It's commenting about what you need to find nice?

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

The subtext there is "looks much less like a tech toy, which is why Glass didn't catch on."