this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19138 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Fueling the growth in political ads this cycle is the presidential race, which has so far seen record primary spend on the Republican side.

More than $100 million was spent through September on Republican primary races, faster than any previous cycle, per political AdImpact, an advertising intelligence firm."

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine if political ads were federally funded with the stipulation that no other funds must be spent on advertising...

Of course, that would be too sane for the U.S.

[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Better: no ads. Give them a website to publish their resume. Make buying airtime illegal.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't mind things like flyers. They let me know where local candidates stand and I wouldn't know to go to every website. But endless TV and internet ads are way too far.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago

A single ballotpedia like website would be my preference, but that raises censorship questions.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 5 points 11 months ago

Apparently formula does something similar with thier team budgets. In that the League will penalize them for going over. With age of internet it's crazy to spend billions.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I can't wait to not see any of it.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

What a waste of money considering more than half these ads will be twisted, borderline slanderous untruths about their political opponents.

It's a waste of money, a waste of time for the viewers, and a downright attack on truth and democracy.

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

There are 257 million voting age adults in the US

I'd rather they just give each of us $60 and be on our way, than endure the onslaught of stupidity and lies

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago

It’s the real reason NH doesn’t want to lose the first primary. All their (remaining) local news and TV is fully funded by political ad money.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

We should be like other countries that limit campaigning to 60-90 days prior to an election.

We won't, but we should.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Remember when you encounter the dispossessed, disenfranchised or the doomers;

If voting didn't matter; if YOU'RE vote didn't matter, the rich wouldn't spend so much to try and get it.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Excellent point! The numbers don't lie.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Cthulhu 2024: Just end it already

[–] blazera@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Thats an awful lot of bribery