this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1434 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60353 readers
5758 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox users are reporting an 'artificial' load time on YouTube videos. YouTube says it's part of a plan to make people who use adblockers "experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mmagod@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they're so shockingly inept, i can't believe it anymore

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

I don't believe this instance of anticompetitive behavior was an accident either. They just thought while doing it for ad blockers, might as through in the competition in the net too. They just got caught. Now they can plausible claim it was an accident.

Like much of big tech, they are too big. This makes also being anticompetitive just too easy to resist.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

I don't mind ads, I understand that websites need to finance themselves to cover their costs (and maybe build up some capital to expand). But I do mind tracking, user profiling, personalization / user targeting, trading this data with dubious companies worldwide, and obnoxious ads, for example pop-ups or auto-play videos with a 1 micron sized close button, or a forced timed ad which is hiding the content.

It's like having a bunch of people following you around, taking note of everything you do, evaluating that data, making statistics, dicsussing it with other people you don't know, etc.. Then, when you want to make yourself a sandwich, step in between you and your sandwich, taking up a megaphone and scream into your face : "OH, WE NOTICED THAT YOU ARE MAKING A SANDWICH. CAN WE INTERST YOU IN NEW FANCY BUTTER KNIVES FOR ONLY 59,99 €?" [Then going on about it for 3 minutes before they are stepping out of your way].

There are laws against that in real life, and in the digital realm this is missing. Considering how much time a lot of people spend online this is something which needs to be taken seriously.

It's really scary sometimes. There was a time when I was stupid enough to use facebook, just to stay in touch with friends. Once I talked with a friend about allergies and asthma, and I told them I have a pollen allergy. A short time later an ad showed up on my facebook feed, advertising some nasal spray for allergies. Wtf?! And that's just the surface. "Harmless" ads. Who knows what else happens with that data?

And then we get stuff like Cambridge Analytica.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Freetube, Newpipe, Indivious. All great.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Buttons@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

make people who use adblockers “experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using.”

The sad thing is, I consider this an upgrade. I'll take a moment to breathe and maybe break out of the negative spiral that is modern internet use.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Five seconds of loading is an upgrade over five consecutive ads

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Huh, I just thought youtube was running slow. Still better than ads.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sordid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I could make YouTube "experience suboptimal revenue" in retaliation, but sadly I can't block more than 100% of ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

YouTube can go screw themselves, use Invidious or Piped to access YouTube. You can also combine this with LibRedirect to automatically redirect all YouTube links to Invidious or Piped. There are amazing mobile clients like LibreTube or NewPipe for Android and Yattee with this guide for iOS. All of these don't have ads or trackers.

[–] spacehedgehog@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't understand why companies still place ads on youtube. I've never ever bought a product or visited a company's website which was advertised on youtube.

Are there really people who listen to youtube ads?

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I've participated in several campaigns that resulted in ~20% increases in sales for targeted ads. It makes a difference.

Sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GrayJay is still working pretty good. I cannot use the YouTube app, or mobile browsers because most of the content I'm interested in isn't highly visual so I like to turn my screen off and listen. I am ok with a reasonable amount of ads but the anti-feature of background play disabled without premium is just stupid.

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

You need YouTube ReVanced.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Ads are sub suboptimal viewing.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Active enshitification.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"We know you didn't do anything wrong. We meant to hurt someone else."

Normally this is when I'd go all yar har fiddle dee dee, and don't get me wrong Imma do a lot of that too, but a lot of my favorite video essay nerds are also on a platform called Nebula that's dirt cheap, ad free and owned outright by the people who make the content. It's a good way to balance the whole "people need to get paid for the content they make" thing with the whole "these platforms are predatory and abusive" thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like all the people running Firefox (most of my friends/family and many colleagues) are just going to say “damn, YouTube sucks. I should look elsewhere” and not “oh, it must be slow because I’m not on chrome.” Heck my parents don’t even know what chrome is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is hillarious! I didn't even notice that. YT always delayed video loading a little. Is this really a change?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tom_bishop@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Deliberately and actively try to make user experience worst is shit evil. Now im gonna actively share ubo to all people i talk IRL

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's like when a teacher can't target the bad kid so they punish the whole class instead.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube sucks now. Just constant ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Still illegal

[–] BlackPit@feddit.ch 15 points 1 year ago

Google's modus operandi - business as usual. Deploying their dirty tricks on their mass of servers to edge out and destroy competition. When caught out they apologize all surprised Pikachu style, then do it again differently. This is likely in response to news about Firefox mobile finally allowing extensions to work. People are probably trying it out, but their Youtube experience will be crap, so they'll go back to chrome.

[–] tristar@lemmyfly.org 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

when are they gonna learn that any client-side restriction or hindrance can and will be defeated? sleep(5000) is kinda like them throwing a fit, not actually trying to punish anyone. obviously we'll find a way to avoid waiting the 5s, do they think we'll just give up?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›