this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
179 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
5253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge rules it's fine for car makers to intercept your text messages::A judge has refused to bring back a class action lawsuit against four car manufacturers because the privacy violation did not meet the WPA standard.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How stringent is the WPA standard anyway? The texts have to be stolen at gunpoint for the express purpose of jerking off to stolen dicktures?

[–] thegreekgeek@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we just buy this asshole's data and do something funny with it ourselves?

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 8 points 1 year ago

Judge r00ty has ruled that it's fine for you to do this.

[–] skoberlink@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't like this but it seems like it is an accurate application of law (IANAL), right?

The right place to fix this is in the company's policies and in the laws in the first place.

Of course, making those company policies more clear and available is important too. Even by TOS standards, I can't imagine many people have read it for their car.

[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Agreed. The letter of the law vs the spirt of the law. So legal but not right

People shouldn’t have to not use or rip out their infotainment systems to have privacy. The automakers know that people are just going to take the path of least resistance and know that people aren’t going to read the fine print

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess I fundamentally misunderstand what's going on here...

If you want to use your phone hands free thtough the info-tainment system, it kind of NEEDS to have access to your calls, contacts, and texts, yeah?

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 year ago

You do NOT need to STORE any of this information in order to use your phone hands free. AT ALL.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It should be able to access them from your phone instead of the cell service.

Using the word 'intercepts' makes it sound like they're doing the latter, although that may not be the case.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it sounds to me like if a call or text comes to your phone, the car catches it before it reaches your phone because the two are connected and the car has priority access.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Judges who take any kind of compensation from large corporations should be stripped of their skin and left to publicly bleed out on display for the world, a constant supply of lemon juice and vinegar showering them.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Your texts are not the property of the auto makers. Guess auto companies don't want you to go hands free. Could open all kinds of extra law suits. Save a dollar and lose a thousand.