this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
137 points (96.6% liked)

News

22901 readers
4037 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

wow, ok. fuck privacy when it comes to cash, right?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like the states privacy laws might be dogshit...

recording of mobile phone activity did not meet the Washington Privacy Act’s standard that a plaintiff must prove that “his or her business, his or her person, or his or her reputation” has been threatened.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago

They should just re-file the suit in California.

[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Its damn hard to prove injury without discovery...

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck is wrong with that judge?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Judges are supposed to rule based on what the law says, not what they think is a good idea. Most likely the law is just inadequate.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Fuck no. The judges interpretation is bullshit.

But the appellate judge ruled Tuesday that the interception and recording of mobile phone activity did not meet the Washington Privacy Act’s standard that a plaintiff must prove that “his or her business, his or her person, or his or her reputation” has been threatened.

Privacy violations ARE A THREAT. Identity theft is a massive threat. Any man in the middle attack is a threat.

Federal judges are corrupt as fuck. I bet that was a Trump appointee.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I bet that was a Trump appointee.

You would lose that bet. David G. Estudillo was appointed to the state judiciary by Gov. Jay Inslee and then to the federal judiciary by Biden.

However, the article misrepresented the ruling. The actual decision (my emphasis) was:

a plaintiff must allege an injury to “his or her business, his or her person, or his or her reputation.”

An injury is more than a threat, it's an actual monetary loss. To show an injury, you need to "bring the receipts" as it were. In this case, the plaintiff did not formally state their injury.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So we don't have privacy as individuals because it doesn't hurt our bank account, but of course that means all businesses get their right to privacy because reason$.

Cool.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's a state law, so if you live in Washington state then you have to show actual damages to win a lawsuit. It should be easy to do so if (for example) a privacy breach led to identity theft. And this requirement applies to both individuals and businesses.

If you live in another state, YMMV. Maybe you have more right to privacy, maybe less.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"His or her person has been threatened" implies physical harm. Sounds dumb or corrupt for privacy legislation, but unless the car companies were using the data to conduct identity theft, it wouldn't be considered a direct threat. Obviously we know them storing the data at all is a threat, even without the data brokers, but the law is shit... and judges are usually technologically illiterate rich kids anyway.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Basically the judge said the plaintiff could not show any harm done to them. Someone who has been arrested based on this could definitely sue and get it stopped.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

God this place is a cesspool. How do armchair lawyers get upvoted like this?

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Privacy is becoming a luxury

[–] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

You want privacy, pay us, and we'll still collect and save the data tho.

[–] Illustrious_Luck5514@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why are cars even getting text messages in the first place?

[–] techt@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The idea is the car reads your texts to you via TTS so it's less tempting to look at your phone while driving.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I just turn the phone on silent. In fact silent is the default mode. To many spammers. There is nothing important enough in my life that requires immediate attention. Might change if I find a woman and get kids but not likely.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I wonder if this interacts with Android Auto. AA essentially uses your car's speakers and screen as peripherals for your phone, so hopefully it's sandboxed out of the car's systems (except then it's Google reading your messages).

[–] vamp07@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll bet this is not as cut and dry as the headline makes it sound.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago
[–] Cyberbatman@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It sucks but the easiest thing to do is to never enable your phone to connect to any of the car USB ports and/or their Bluetooth data service. Also find out were your car connects to voice speaker and remove the fuse from it or if you want to just cut the cable off completely.