this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
303 points (93.2% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4914 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders said Sunday he doesn’t know that a ceasefire is possible in the Israel-Hamas war with “an organization like Hamas” involved.

“I don’t know how you can have a ceasefire, (a) permanent ceasefire, with an organization like Hamas, which is dedicated to turmoil and chaos and destroying the state of Israel,” Sanders told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Union” Sunday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 118 points 10 months ago (100 children)

I don't think peace is possible when one side is holding the other in an open air prison and giving them only the amount of calories needed to not die (after the war started even that was suspended)

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Stop calling it a prison, prisons are for convicted criminals, Palestinian's only crime is being Palestinian. These were open air concentration camps, they are now open air extermination camps

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

prisons are for convicted criminals,

Always?

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Have you ever seen Gaza? I thought it looked more like a city.

Is "open air concentration camps" now a code word for dense urban city?

image

Honestly this looks like a pretty nice city to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

Does that change anything?

Hamas is a terrorist organization with strong ties to Iran. We've already seen what happens when terrorist groups destabilize countries and take control. Syria is an ongoing testament to that. So is Afghanistan

Are the Israeli Government's sins the reason why Hamas is in power? The extent is arguable, but it would be a lie to outright say "no".

But... does that change anything?

Hamas is the power in Gaza. Any form of concessions that don't involve the destruction of Hamas will be considered a win because the Palestinian people have been held in an open air prison for decades. And that will just lead to Hamas becoming more powerful.

If someone was abused horrifically as a child and decided to get a gun and take it out on others, what do you do? In a just world, you get them the help that they need. But in any world, the first thing you do is take the gun away before they can hurt anyone else.

What that means in this situation? I don't know. Short of external military intervention, the Israeli government is not going to stand down. And I for one don't want the US and NATO to fuck around in yet another middle eastern country for another two decades only to leave it considerably worse than we found it.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You realize Israel is controlling the prison in reality, right?

Hamas doesn't shoot Palestinians that go to far off the coast, Israel does.

Hamas didn't erect a huge border wall around Gaza, Israel did.

Hamas doesn't control the supply of food, water, and goods into Gaza. Israel does.

Who controls Gaza?

[–] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (10 children)

WRT the wall at least:

Hamas's goal from securing power in 2007 has been rejecting the two state solution and destroying Israel leading to many many attacks since then so, maybe securing the border isn't an insane idea? I mean, fuck all good the wall did recently but still.

Hamas doesn't control the supply of food, water, and goods into Gaza. Israel does.

Slightly amend that one, Egypt also supports the blockade. That being said, it's not the fault of all the civilians in Gaza that people voted in 2007 to let a terrorist organization take over and things went poorly because of it. This blockade needs to end. Humanitarian aid needs to be able to get to Gaza.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to get fully bogged down in the semantics, but Israel still basically controls the Egypt border.

The US forced a vote, didn't like the outcome, attempted to coup Hamas, and failed. Also, if Hamas is so bad (which they are in many respects), why does Israel fund them and explicitly has a policy of only interacting with them as being the legitimate government?

Easy, they want an unsympathetic enemy that does not want peace. They want to continue the project of taking the rest of Israel for the ethnostate.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm overall on board for this comment but how does Israel find Hamas?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] conquer4@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

At least for #2, you might want to do more research into why hamas doesn't have prisons in Gaza..

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (98 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Remember people,

Hamas != Palestina

Putin's mafia != Russia

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Also with regard to Russians. I work retail, and lately have more and more Russians come in, speaking broken English, very polite, always respectful.

It both warms and breaks my heart to see them. It’s so sad that they’ve left their homeland, but it’s inspiring that they decided they’d rather move across the planet than be puppets to a warlord so deranged as to conscript soldiers.

They always seem a little sheepish. Always like “sorry, sorry” for asking me questions, for taking up my time. I just want to tell them “I’m so glad you’re here! You’re a blessing to me! Stop apologizing please!” but unless they come out and tell me their situation it’s not my place to comment on it.

We’ve got this dim view of “draft dodgers”, but the reality is it takes courage to say no to one’s own government, to put oneself in danger to avoid becoming an armed puppet of someone else’s ambition.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You know, I wonder how many people would support guerilla tactics if they were living in the fucking hunger games.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Murdering civilians isn't 'guerilla tactics'. It's not even a useful form of terrorism.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Seems to be working for Bibi.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago

Let me rephrase that - it's not a useful form of terrorism for achieving reasonable goals. If one's goal is to perpetuate a pointless and bloody sectarian conflict so that one can hold onto power over their own people even as the overall prosperity of the nation suffers, I guess murdering civilians is useful.

When killing is mostly or entirely random, all that happens is that the civilian population at large begins to consider themselves (rightly) under threat, and the conflict is perpetuated by mutual fear and spite rather than fear being a means to leverage negotiations or achieving policy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly probably the same amount of people who'd support carpet bombing Florida if they started firing missiles into neighbouring states.

If you only imagine yourself on one side it's easy to say the other one is evil but live isn't that simple really

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I mean it is florida after all; I'm not sure the missiles would be necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›