this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
417 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shortly after Hutchinson's remarks, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie was also loudly booed as soon as he took the stage and throughout his remarks as he also seemingly addressed the Republican divide.

"The problem is, you want to shout down any voice that says anything different than what you want to hear. You can continue to do it, and believe me—believe me, it doesn't bother me one bit," Christie said, who is also running for president.

The Republican fired back at the boos by saying, "You can yell and boo about it as much as you like, but it doesn't change the truth. And the truth is coming."

Christie added: "And all of you need to understand: America needs better than what we've had. And it never makes America a better place, whether it's on a college campus in an Ivy League or whether it's in an auditorium in Orlando, for us to be booing and shouting down opinions we don't agree with."

I'm sure there's plenty of people ready to point out the many ways in which Chris Christie is a piece of shit. But I really do appreciate the way he's willing to actually confront others in his party and call them out on their bullshit. Even among Trumps critics and would be rivals, so many others are retiring, acquiescing, or just desperately tip toeing around the truth to avoid upsetting the flavor aid connoisseurs. But Christie is out their scolding the crowd like obnoxious little shits that they are.

And no, it won't change the minds of the people who are booing him, they already went off the deep end. But it may help shatter the illusion for those who are moving in that direction, who have been living an echo chamber, and who need someone to be the first to point out that the emperor has no clothes.

[–] blivet@artemis.camp 20 points 1 year ago

flavor aid connoisseurs

Nice one.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is he's playing the long game. With how these idiots mindlessly follow trump and must reshape their whole beliefs every time he contradicts the last one, Christie is just banking on them mindlessly shuffling to the next hypocritical stop on their train ride of bullshit. Christie probably thinks trump will fall far enough when the results of some of the trials start trickling in. He wants to position himself as the new savior they can worship. He expects them to ignore the previous few years of hate and vitriol they fomented and fall in line with the next guy.

I think they are stupid enough to do it.

[–] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

I don’t think Christie expects to be an idol to these people, he just wants some political power.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I think Christie was someone who Trump wanted to be VP, until Trump's plane had 'maintenance' issues and Trump was forced to stick around for a meeting with Pence which was Manafort's pick for VP.

Then Christie was put to overseeing the transfer team, which Trump shut down and yelled at Christie because they raised so much money for the transition that Trump wanted for himself. Christie of course tried to explain the money was needed for a proper transfer but we all know how that went. There's an article about that bit for those that may not have seen it.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know your campaign is rough when you're quoted as "Republican" instead of by name.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funny enough either they changed the title or they decided his name was only worth it for the url link were actually says his name as part of the url path title.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"why are you booing me? I'm right."

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

The intersection of correctness and politics is a very, very small set.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the moment for the party to break Trump’s hold over them. A hold that’s going to continue to cause them to lose in the greater scale. And, because they’re cowardice as fuck, they’re choosing to chain themselves further to him.

Every single republican (outside of those 8 or so idiots in the house who would never) should unify in ousting him.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they’re choosing to chain themselves further to him.

Nah. If for some reason Trump became unpopular (said vaccines work or something) these same people could come out tomorrow and say they never liked Trump and the base wouldn't care.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

said vaccines work or something

He actually did say that lol. And then he was booed. And then they all forgot about it. There's nothing permanent in their mindset, there's only what is maintained by endless repetition from their media sources.

[–] rthmchgs@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 year ago

Jack Nicholson in A Few Good Men comes to mind.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson was loudly booed on Saturday after he told a Republican summit that there is "significant likelihood" that former President Donald Trump will be found guilty of a felony next year.

The former president has been facing a wave of legal scrutiny at both the state and federal levels by being indicted in four separate cases: two brought by Department of Justice (DOJ) special counsel Jack Smith, one by the Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and another by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in Georgia.

Trump has denied wrongdoing in all cases while claiming that all of his legal woes are part of an orchestrated "witch hunt" by his political enemies as he runs for president again in 2024.

While speaking at the Florida Freedom Summit, an event featuring presidential candidates like Hutchinson, the former governor cited his own experience as a prosecutor to predict the outcome of Trump's legal troubles.

As a party, we must support the rule of law, we cannot win as a country without integrity in the White House," Hutchinson added.

And it never makes America a better place, whether it's on a college campus in an Ivy League or whether it's in an auditorium in Orlando, for us to be booing and shouting down opinions we don't agree with."


The original article contains 573 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Wow there’s another Republican who isn’t a cowardly pussy and capable of telling the truth.

load more comments
view more: next ›