this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

Tolkien, Lord of the Rings (LotR), etc.

1219 readers
33 users here now

For all things Tolkien, Lord of The Rings (LotR), and The Hobbit across all media. Speak friend and enter.

Rules:

Please report any rule violations.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doublepluskirk@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

There are definite themes of 'old' or 'ancient bloodlines' making better or stronger men and elves, as arda generally declines in many ways. Look at Númenor and its genetic legacy. It's a short leap for fascists and racists towards blood and racial purity nonsense, and the decline of, or assault on, so called 'Western civilisation' from the 'hordes' of eaterlings and haradrim. It's a narrow minded and surface level view of the literature, but morons aren't exactly known for their media literacy.

[–] LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago

Ol Sharkey is out to scour Italy now. Blow your horn, Merry!

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I know that the rules in the sidebar says No Politics, but this is specifically relevant.

Does anyone have the Italian version they reference with the tone-setting forward? I'd be interested in seeing it.

[–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In Italy there are mainly two translations of LotR, one is the "historical" one to which many old school fans are religiously attached like the Bible even if it contains some mistakes (translation by Alliata, 1967), the newer one is more faithful to the original but has some unfortunate choices (especially for some names of places, rivers, even characters) and is considered "heretic" (translation by Fatica, 2019).

Italian fans are usually split into lovers or haters of the new (Fatica) translation.

I personally love the first translation I read when I was a kid, which is Bompiani's revision of 2009 of the Alliata version, even if it contains mistakes.

[–] ahimsabjorn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the article’s connection to some of the aspects of the source material is relevant as well. As long as the conversation stays civil, I don’t see a problem with its inclusion in this community.

Absolutely, it's worth talking about since it's not a new phenomena with Tolkien's work. We should be mindful of these kinds of interpretations and be clear about how we, as a community, respond.

[–] Historical_General@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Italy has a shameful fascist past and present that can abuse Tolkien's work like many other fascists do. Italy's shambolic, incoherent and ridiculous fascism melds well with Tolkien's own multifaceted views in some respects. He did (as a Catholic not a fascist) support Franco, though in later life turn towards the traditional left wing libertarianism/anarchism. And his letter to the Nazis condemning their bigotry is well-known.