15
How did The Lord of the Rings become a secret weapon in Italy’s culture wars? | Jamie Mackay
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)
Tolkien, Lord of the Rings (LotR), etc.
1219 readers
33 users here now
For all things Tolkien, Lord of The Rings (LotR), and The Hobbit across all media. Speak friend and enter.
Rules:
- No abusive language
- No buying, selling or advertising
- Be civil
- No politics
- No discussions about race
- No bots
- No memes or AI-generated content
- Don't criticize others for their opinions
- If you found the image on the web, it is encouraged to put the direct link to the image in the ‘Link’ field when creating a post, instead of uploading the image to Lemmy. Direct links usually end in .jpg, .png, etc.
- No unrelated posts
- No spoilers in title, mark spoilers
- Let people like what they like
- Follow all Lemmy.world rules
Please report any rule violations.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know that the rules in the sidebar says No Politics, but this is specifically relevant.
Does anyone have the Italian version they reference with the tone-setting forward? I'd be interested in seeing it.
In Italy there are mainly two translations of LotR, one is the "historical" one to which many old school fans are religiously attached like the Bible even if it contains some mistakes (translation by Alliata, 1967), the newer one is more faithful to the original but has some unfortunate choices (especially for some names of places, rivers, even characters) and is considered "heretic" (translation by Fatica, 2019).
Italian fans are usually split into lovers or haters of the new (Fatica) translation.
I personally love the first translation I read when I was a kid, which is Bompiani's revision of 2009 of the Alliata version, even if it contains mistakes.
I think the article’s connection to some of the aspects of the source material is relevant as well. As long as the conversation stays civil, I don’t see a problem with its inclusion in this community.
Absolutely, it's worth talking about since it's not a new phenomena with Tolkien's work. We should be mindful of these kinds of interpretations and be clear about how we, as a community, respond.