this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
1221 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58070 readers
2799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 184 points 10 months ago (5 children)

The internet needs to be classified as a utility, living without it is just not possible in the world we have created.

[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 83 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I remember the collective shitfit around a decade ago when Obama give out free cell phones to homeless people. It was such a crazy concept to people who have never struggled that yes, you DO need a smartphone to meet your calling, banking and personal management needs. Everything has an online portal. Every job application requires an online portion. It's how the world works and has worked since the mid 00s.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 159 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Should be 1gbps asymmetric now, with a near future goal of 1gbps symmetric.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 137 points 10 months ago (12 children)

I'd be okay with 200mbps symmetric, with a future goal of 1gbps symmetric. More than ANYTHING, I'm tired of providers providing things like 1gbps down, 10mbps up. And then doing shit like "Here's you're 1gbps plan with a 1tb data cap!"

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 45 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I really wish symmetric broadband was standard. Having 500 down (as a homelabber especially) means nothing if you have only 25 up 😭

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Same boat here with Comcast. I would gladly give up some of the 800Mbps download to increase the 12Mbps upload speed I'm getting.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

800Mbps*

*with SPEEDBOOST! (We throttle lawl)

[–] gkd@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

We don’t throttle to our company-owned Speedtest servers though so we can disprove you when claiming we are not offering you peak speeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Uprise42@artemis.camp 17 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The asymmetrical aspect of cable will be here to stay. Fiber can do it because it was build on a different foundation.

Copper cable transmits data using electric signals in various frequencies. There are a batch of frequencies reserved for phone and TV. ALL of the tv programming is constantly streamed to your lines whether you have TV or not and whether you pay for it or not. It’s encrypted and is only decrypted by your cable boxes when your provider says they can decrypt it. The phone frequencies are reserved so you can make phone calls and still max out your download.

So what about the rest of the bandwidth? Well, way back in the early days of cable it was pretty much everyone for themselves. Every company did things its own way. That’s where DOCSIS came in. It’s a platform that allows modem manufacturers to make modems that will work on any cable network that supports Docsis. And the key part is that DOCSIS is always backwards compatible. The network upgrade to 3.1 did not break the old d2 devices.

When it was developed the download was extremely more necessary than the upload. You’d be sending small single line commands on upload and receiving entire files in download. So more frequencies went to download than upload. In a lab setting 1.0 could reach 40mbps down and 10 up. That’s not what was sold because real life isn’t a lab and there’s loss over large distances. Realistically most people got 10 mb down and upload wasn’t even listed.

Whats changed? Well today those same download and upload frequencies are still used. We’ve added more around them to deliver higher speeds. But we’ve also kept the same principles that people need more download than upload. Docsis 3.1 was released in 2013. We really didn’t start stressing over upload until Covid and work from home had us on zoom calls all day.

Docsis 4.0 is technically released but requires quite a bit of overhaul to work with existing networks. We pretty much need to do away with cable tv. That’s why many ISP’s are pushing IPTv. It removes the need for all that bandwidth devoted to just TV. If everyone in a region drops traditional cable for IPTv they can easily switch to d4. D4 does increase upload but does not make it symmetrical.

Your cable company does not decide their highest tier realistically. It’s the most that medium will offer. It’s gonna be a while too for d4 to be available everywhere. Everyone would need to drop traditional cable (which is honestly a nice move regardless) and people don’t upgrade plans very often. When I worked in tech support I would frequently deal with customers complaining about slow speeds while on plans from 2002.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You get a terabyte cap? Jfc, where I live it’s like a few gigs, and that can cost into the hundreds for maybe 25.

[–] registrert@lemmy.sambands.net 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You guys have caps? Jfc, how do you pirate 3TB a month in pure spite of the hegemony of current year capitalism?

I shouldn't be too cocky though, I have a 40GB cap. On my phone. 😢

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fraydabson@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Yeah states with Comcast caps you at 1.2TB unless you pay $50 for the unlimited plan, which I don't think is even offered everywhere. They discount it to $30 if you use their modem.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] geekworking@lemmy.world 100 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does this really matter. We aren't getting it anyway.

The telcom/cable companies are just going to take the "broadband" money, build out a couple of neighborhoods, claim it is too hard, and then keep all the money.

They have already done it many times. Free taxpayer money with zero repercussions. Why would they do anything different.

[–] krellor@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have a lot of experience with rural broadband initiatives, and generally yes, the FCC designation sets the minimums we see in terms of new service delivery to underserved communities. I specifically worked with state and municipal entities to build grant packages to fund infrastructure and these new minimums would be a great help.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (7 children)

We are between towns in western WA state stuck with 10Mb DSL service. There are a lot of us folks. After moving in (the PO said the internet was great, lol), we discovered that doing anything excessive like downloading AND streaming would not work. One thing at a time. We were able to bond two pair and get 20Mb which is workable, but that's where we sit. Gigabit service is all around us, but we'd have to trench a mile up the road and pay for that to even think about getting a provider to lay a line. Century Link outright laughed at me.

I was able to get T-Mo's home internet as a backup since we WFH, but it isn't stellar either.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 99 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If the federal government is regulating them can we admit they're a fucking utility already and stop allowing them to gouge prices when they have more money than they could feasibly spend?

Can you imagine if we said "by 2035 every American household in our electric grid will also be connected to the internet at a speed of 1gbps"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 78 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I could give a shit what they call it. How about enforcing some god damn price restrictions or make data caps illegal? Speed means little otherwise

[–] lemmeout@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

This actually does keep prices in check. Albeit, a bit backasswardsly.

I may be off on the specifics but it's something like: Having to offer 100mbps at the lowest rates in (poor neighborhoods) increases the speeds of each tier while keeping the price the same.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 77 points 10 months ago (11 children)

We really need some upstream minimums as well. That causes so much lag for me. Most plans are 1 up even with 100 down. I have a 200/10 plan now and it's difficult to do work with the maybe 5 that I get in practice if I'm lucky, especially after overhead from VPN.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Most plans are 1 up even with 100 down

That can't be right. I thought Australia's 100/20 plans had pathetic upload speeds but that's unreal.

[–] yuknowhokat@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I have Spectrum here in the southeast of the United States. My plan is 300 down 12 up. That pathetic upload speed needs to change for the better.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Most broadband access in the US is via coax. And the coax companies refuse to let cable TV, and the packages they can bundle, die. So the portion of the coax that would allow for symmetrical service instead brings all the channels you didn't buy because everyone streams now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago

Can’t wait til they give another few hundred billion to ISPs who turn it into bonuses instead of infra improvement

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago

As it should have been 5 years ago. Maybe even more.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

5 years late but better than never.

[–] popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I did telecom work about 5 years ago

It was shocking the amount of area that depends on a low-quality copper wire infrastructure.

I don't know if that changed in 5 years, but companies are going to have a hard time getting that replaced nationwide

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

They just won't be able to call it broadband.

[–] poprocks@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We live in a rural area (but only 16 miles from the nearest city) and have copper. We really hope the infrastructure bill will bring real internet to us in our lifetime.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Redhotkurt@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You might have figured it out by now, but "megabits per second" is abbreviated as "Mbps" with an uppercase m; yeah, it's kinda pedantic, but using lowercase means it's a millibit, which is much, much smaller. The same applies to "gigabits per second," which should be expressed as "Gbps."

At any rate, thank you for posting this, it really is good news. And about time they did this, too.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's common parlance to use Mbps and mbps interchangeably since nothing uses "millibits" as a unit of measurement. More commonly people misuse Mbps and MBps which is incorrect since it signifies bits and bytes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Laugh in Western European (10Gbps)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

100 mbps? That's 100 millibits per second, or 0.1 bits per second. I'd certainly hope for better bandwidth than one bit every ten seconds; that's slower than smoke signals.

[–] simple@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I wish we can all move to MB/s and get rid of the endless confusion on names

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

We should change to mibibits! We need easily factored numbers of 10, not this old powers of 2 stuff! (/s if it wasn't obvious)

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sarcasm noted, but: mibi/gibi are the powers of 2 version.

We all say megabit or gigabit when talking about internet speeds, but in many cases under the hood it's actually measured in mibi/gibibits. Just means it's 2% more when converted into base 10 ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 10 months ago (7 children)

It should also require allowing incoming connections. Too much ISPs, especially mobile, are gives one-way Internet now. Basically like having a phone line with no phone number.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You should google "CG-NAT" and learn why mobile providers don't (and simply can't) provide you a public IP. Get yourself a cheap VPS, set up a reverse proxy, and open all the ports you want.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I just don't get it. Why not making upload speed same as download speed?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

On all lines the total amount of available bandwidth has to be split between upload and download. If you've got gigabits or even hundreds of megabits to play with then symmetric is great, but on slower connections is makes a world of sense to heavily favour download just because humans are better at consuming information than creating it. Consider how many hours of videos the average person watches per week versus how many they create in the same period. Same for photos, emails, articles, etc. There are people who have parity but they are in a pretty tiny minority.

That said, I hear there are people in the US getting 300Mb/s down and 10Mb/s up which is pretty fucking nuts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I could also get 100mbps for less than $80 a month that'd be great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Slightly off topic but I seriously hope the Dems have a good plan to tell the general public of the US, just how much Biden and his administration has done for good progressive legislation this far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I'm out here living on 10 Mbps up / 1 Mbps down.

I hate living in LATAM.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Go get them FCC! Lets move into the future.

load more comments
view more: next ›