this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
317 points (95.2% liked)

News

23295 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kyrsten Sinema doesn't care one bit if she wins re-election, according to a new book.

"I can go on any board I want to. I can be a college president. I can do anything," she said.

Sinema told Romney said she saved the filibuster and the Senate and that's "good enough for me."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hogunner@lemmy.world 146 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Getting real “I am the main character” vibes from this wretch.

[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

That’s a weird way to spell “conceited cunt.”

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah for sure. Thinks she is better than everyone for no reason.

[–] Thunderbird4@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

doesn't care one bit if she wins re-election

= Fuck you

"I can go on any board I want to."

= I got mine

What a lovely sentiment from a public servant.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Ahh the conservative mantra.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 88 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just like DeSantis post-2025, I'll boycott and badmouth any company that hires her stupid ass.

Odds are you already are.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's nice that she is making the cash grab obvious.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the interests fairness sinema wasn't directly quoted saying this. From the article:

According to reporter McKay Coppins's new book, "Romney: A Reckoning," Sinema once told Republican Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah that she could "do anything" once she's out of office and feels that what she's done in the Senate is "good enough."

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

So the "quote" in the title isn't even hers, but a paraphrasing in first person? That's grade A bullshit.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 year ago

What a smug asshole. Saved the Senate...wtf?

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

As an Arizonan it is my life's mission to make sure she loses.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 40 points 1 year ago

Doesn't surprise me that she's a deluded narcissist.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

funny when terrible people put it in writing themselves. it would be more funny if she didnt fuck over a ton of people in the process

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

To be e fair. This is from a book about mitt Romney. She wasn't being quoted directly.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saved the senate? For who?

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Her and manchin publicly argue that getting rid of the filibuster would allow republicans to gut the social safety net when/if they take control of government. I think that's a bad argument though because there's always another election and if Republicans did do that then votes could put Democrats back in power to restore and/or improve everything.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess we could flip flop on stuff like that but the folks screwed over during the interim are going to have a really bad time.

Of course that's also assuming some Democrats aren't convinced (💰) to go along and we never get these program back. And if we do then we lose them again when the Republicans manage to up their voter suppression & gerrymandering game.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

if Republicans did do that then votes could put Democrats back in power to restore and/or improve everything.

Except it takes a lot more time, effort and money to rebuild something than it does to destroy it.

As the Bigen administration is currently experiencing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (17 children)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So she connived her way into power purely for the clout and opportunities it would give her, I guess that's pretty par for the course.

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, you're saying she's the run of the mill, common American politician?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One with all the pretence removed.

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This is becoming more and more common.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TomMasz@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's narcissistic and douchey. But it's unfortunately not delusion. It's hard to deny she had an impact. She wreaked havoc in the Senate. And now she has a golden ticket to go on to sit on boards, be ceo of something, or just be a public speaker and get paid shit tonnes of money. The system is set up for Senators

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If this is accurately reported then it definitely shows her priorities. I'm not going to lie I'm nervous that a threeway Arizona Senate race is going to make Keri lake a senator. We'll see when the race heats up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I bet she doesn't. What a greedy dickhead.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] books@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The last part of that sentence is unfortunately true.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sounds pretty arrogant.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, sounds like the kind of shit someone who's scared of a revolution would say.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought we had "revolving door" policies at the federal level. Maybe that's something we need to have, like a lot of other things.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding is that they're are no limitations on members of Congress after they leave office. Trump did put a ban on people on his administration becoming lobbyists, I think it was a five year ban, but he rescinded it towards the end of his term.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's pretty sad that my state ethics process is stricter than the federal government's.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It really is. The vast majority of states don't have any laws like that too. Mine doesn't.

load more comments
view more: next ›