There would be nothing hypocritical from the russian side, their offer afaik still stands, entire issue has been solely unilateral move by EU.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)
GenZedong
4186 readers
25 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Agreed, I think I meant hypocritical in the sense of how Russia is pushing for a more multipolar world and less reliance on the west.
It is what Russia tried to do for years. Removing EU from the US sphere of interest (more like complete vassalization by now) would make the world much less unipolar. Also that was formulated by the end of 90's, before the meteoric rise of China - back then the EU-Russia closing was the most promising option for ending the USA domination - and USA also know it, they went so far to sabotage this prosepect that instead they caused Russia-China closing.