this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
61 points (91.8% liked)

Europe

3867 readers
20 users here now

Europa

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mateoto@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Each of them has the potential to contribute to addressing the ecological, social, and economic challenges facing our society, yet I suspect that most are not taking any action.

[–] Dmian@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

What challenges? They’re doing FINE! /s

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 6 points 11 months ago

These people are some of the biggest money junkies on earth. They are so addicted to money that they wouldn't mind wrecking everything around them for some profits. At this point I don't think they qualify to do anything good for society

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Name one of them that doesn't own a company that profits on fooling and tricking people

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

KONE makes elevators and escalators. I guess there's always stairs but elevators and escalators are quite handy

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Moving stairs are witch craft. They trick people with their magic moving stairs, when it's just little fairies that were enslaved by the black stone of Deathkill the evil wizward that manually move the stairs.

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 2 points 11 months ago

If they are bigger than all other competitors they probably manufacture their elevators in china and profit on cheap labor. They also probably own all sort of these silly patents about pressing a button with a finger of walking at a certain angle

[–] joneskind@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

That’s unfair, you’re basically asking who isn’t a billionaire, which turns out to be paradoxical.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This title implies there are some people who are the poorest billionaires. I really hate that

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's true, people just above 1 billion are the poorest billionaires.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

how on earth do they survive on only 1 billion??

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

It's not that they're poor in absolute terms, but they're just poorest out of that specific group.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It must be embarrassing for them

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Not as embarrassing as falling into the millionaire category!

I think there is a Simpsons episode where Burns is no longer billionaire and he gets expelled from the club.

[–] yogsototh@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Looks like the French is richer than the sum of all other billionaires of Europe.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Second richest person in the world

French national Bernard Arnault is the chair and CEO of LVMH, the world’s largest luxury goods company. LVMH brands include Louis Vuitton, Hennessey, Marc Jacobs, and Sephora.

[–] deft@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 months ago

I dislike how people claim who is richer.

Putin owns an economy, Kim owns an economy. I think they might be richer. I think plenty of people are far richer

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

The Icelandic guy is incredibly wealthy when you consider the population of Iceland. If redistributed equally, each Icelander would get $6700.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Supposedly, Putin is worth over $200 billion, making him richer than all of them.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of that is just an image. Like we've found out about their actual military state.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Good point.