this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
818 points (95.1% liked)

Memes

45528 readers
1071 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Lisa, if I didn't have this gun, the king of England could walk right in here and start pushing you around!"

It's not as funny now that Charlie would do it if he could, with his grubby little hands.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least there actually is a king of England now.

There hasn't been a King of England since 1707.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Active Shooter"

It's like reading about a hurricane. Almost a weather phenomenon.

[–] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

There are far fewer hurricanes. You also get a couple days warning on most weather events. I take your point though, between waking up to seeing a related push message and seeing this meme I had forgotten about it.

At least it appears nobody died, only 5 injured.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

The key to getting on with life is to have complete and utter disregard for the well-being of your children, family, friends, fellow countrymen and yourself.

[–] Shizu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"A man who has nothing to lose, has nothing to fear."

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. - Benjamin Franklin.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does he mean by liberty exactly? I feel like we’re well past that

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

:Looks at Trump MAGA slow motion facist take over of the government:

Are we really over that liberty thing?

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is liberty referring to freedom? Liberation from what? What is freedom? The jan 6 people were mostly getting social media washed into their behaviour. Admittedly someone has to be open to it before they can be primed but each step is necessary to achieve this kind of mania. My point is how much are we truely freely thinking when we’re constantly having our attention pulled to events that have carefully curated narratives already prepared for our consumption.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well you have the freedom to buy into whichever flavor of propaganda you prefer. I don’t think there are too many alternatives flavors of propaganda offered to Chinese or Russian citizens…

Join your local radical (in a cool way 😎) militia if you're actually worried.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sort of. This is more like “A man who cares for nothing, has no reason to care.” These people have everything to lose they just don’t think it will happen to them personally

They want it to happen to the "other" groups to whom it's "supposed to happen"

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

At least four people were wounded, none critically, in a shooting at Morgan State University in Baltimore on Tuesday, according to authorities, who urged students to take shelter on the campus of the historically Black college.

No one dead, Americans won't care.

[–] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They don't care when someone does die either...

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Some people actively get mad too when you mention that people died.

"Of course people died, here we go another fucking gun grab wrapped in a sob story. If all THOSE people had guns too it'd have never happened. This is what you get for being unprepared now stfu I'm shopping online for another AR. 🤷"

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any country where you need a gun in order to feel safe walking around is a shithole.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's kind of wild to me the number of people that think teachers having guns is a good idea, that way teachers can get into a shootout with students that go crazy. Absolutely insane.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

People have gone numb as an emotional safeguard. People have lives they're trying to live, and if they fell to pieces every time someone got shot in this country they'd die of dehydration from all the crying.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is so much death and cruelty in the world that if someone cares too much they are just bound to wind up depressed. It seems that the majority of people really only care about people that they are acquainted with, or if they witness the terrible thing in person. It's just kind of built into human nature, otherwise we would be in a constant state of grief.

Things like mass shootings bother most empathetic people, in general. It's just that life kind of has to go on, and all they can really do to try and change it is to vote for one of two lesser evils in some local or national election.

The problem is not really with the people. It's with our crappy political system that is controlled by corporate lobbyists. The majority of US citizens don't really seem to have a say. Source: Empathetic person with chronic depression.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Heck, the government doesn't consider it a mass shooting unless there's three people that died! How fucked up is that?

[–] deezbutts@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

✅ hbcu

✅ no casualties

✅ Dispute "between two groups"

Had to Ctrl+f to even find it as a bullet point on the CNN front page...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Isycius@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, to be fair, what they meant to say is "There is no way to prevent this while not changing gun law, state of mental healthcare, income inequality in economic classes, or criminal law and policing issues." which is correct statement overall.

[–] masinko@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That title is what the Onion (a satirical/parody news site) uses every time there is a major mass shooting in America.

[–] 666@lib.lgbt 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean i generally agree with your point and i know its a small detail but it kinda rubs me the wrong way when people always bring up mental health when talking about mass shootings. There isn't much of a link between mental illness and violence despite common belief. And i have ptsd, bipolar and psychosis which are often associated with violence but i and nearly everyone else with these illnesses just these shooters as nazi assholes. I don't believe you had any wrong intentions or anything and i believe that healthcare is a human right, but i thought i should clarify.

[–] CarterDarter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So you don't think a lot of these mass shooters went with untreated and ignored mental illness which sprouted in to things worse than most people could ever understand and it was too late? It's a huge issue that these people would show signs beforehand and nobody did anything about their mental health or bullying.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It is a huge problem that people with mental health issues go undiagnosed and untreated. It's also very disingenuous the same people who want to blame mental health for all gun related violence will do absolutely nothing to provide care for people with mental health issues AND actively oppose providing care.

Despite all of that, if mental health was truly the main driving force behind mass shootings you would expect a higher rate of violence among the documented populous of people with mental health issues. That alone isn't conclusive of anything but when you do look at the data and it shows the exact opposite you have to question the original hypothesis.

Maybe, not generalizing all mental health to be the cause for people to be violent, would be a place to start? Possibly. Are there specific disorders that contribute whether or not someone is capable of violent acts? Who knows but I can guarantee to you the people pointing the finger at mental health do not care, in the slightest, to find out.

[–] CarterDarter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is a huge problem that people with mental health issues go undiagnosed and untreated. It's also very disingenuous the same people who want to blame mental health for all gun related violence will do absolutely nothing to provide care for people with mental health issues AND actively oppose providing care.

Truly. It's sickening seeing Americans advocate even harder for gun laws while completely ignoring the mental health or bullying scenarios that cause these..

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

I don't accept their premise that gun proponents oppose health care. I think that is true of Republicans in general, but while I would concede that Republicans are better for gun rights, I do not accept that they are actually "pro gun".

Trump was certainly not pro-gun. He supported broad gun control before he was a presidential candidate. As president, he infamously called for taking guns first, due process later.

Previous Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney promoted and signed a state-level gun ban into law; Romney was certainly not pro-gun. Most Republican lawmakers are wishy-washy at best on guns. They pay lip service to the second amendment, and then fail to support any pro-gun issues whatsoever.

The greatest measure sought by pro-gun advocates is national reciprocity - 50-state recognition of any state's concealed carry license. Republicans do not support that measure.

The Firearm Owners Protection Act adopted a uniform set of transport rules for people engaged in interstate travel. So, even if a gun was prohibited in a specific state, a traveler could possess that gun while passing through the state. Gun proponents offered an update to FOPA to allow traveling licensees to carry on the interstate if they were legal at their origin and destination. This would be a compromise to the desired 50-state reciprocity; Republicans refused to advance it.

Another big one was the Hearing Protection Act, which would have delisted silencers from the national firearm registey, and re-regulated them in the same way as pistols, rifles, and shotguns. Republicans refused to support it.

Republicans are better on guns than Democrats, but Republicans are still pretty terrible on anything gun proponents actually want.

Republican opposition to universal health care is yet another way that Republicans fail gun owners, who regularly call for such measures.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Despite all of that, if mental health was truly the main driving force behind mass shootings you would expect a higher rate of violence among the documented populous of people with mental health issues.

There is. There is no question that mental illness strongly correlates with a propensity for violence.

From the source:

A meta-analysis of 204 studies of psychosis as a risk factor for violence reported that “compared with individuals with no mental disorders, people with psychosis seem to be at a substantially elevated risk for violence.” Psychosis “was significantly associated with a 49%–68% increase in the odds of violence.”

A review of 22 studies published between 1990 and 2004 “concluded that major mental disorders, per se, especially schizophrenia, even without alcohol or drug abuse, are indeed associated with higher risks for interpersonal violence.” Major mental disorders were said to account for between 5% and 15% of community violence.

Among 3,743 individuals with bipolar disorder, 8.4% committed violent crimes compared to 3.5% of the general population in Sweden.

A 2014 study in Israel identified 3,187 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. They committed four times more violent crimes compared to the general population, and this difference was even more pronounced among women.

A 10-year follow-up of 1,056 severely mentally ill patients discharged from mental hospitals in Sweden in 1986 reported that "of those who were 40 years old or younger at the time of discharge, nearly 40% had a criminal record as compared to less than 10% of the general public." Furthermore, "the most frequently occurring crimes are violent crimes."

The best study used the Danish psychiatric case register, covering the whole country, and convictions for criminal offenses. Between 1978 and 1990, 6.7% of males and 0.9% of females with "major mental disorders" (psychoses) were convicted of a violent crime ("all offenses involving interpersonal aggression or a threat thereof") compared with 1.5% of males and 0.1% of females among individuals with no psychiatric diagnosis.

A Swedish study examined the criminal records of all individuals born in Stockholm in 1953 and still living in the city 30 years later. Men and women with severe mental illness were 4.2 times (men) and 27.5 times (women) more likely to have been convicted of a violent crime compared to individuals with no psychiatric diagnosis.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] query@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The gun crowd bring it up only to do nothing about it anyway. It's just something to blame, they don't want to fund healthcare, education, research and welfare, and lose their scapegoat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

"We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas!"

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For those that don't know the reference, this is traditionally posted each and every time a mass shooting happens in FreedomLand.

https://www.theonion.com/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this-r-1848971668

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's also weird to have traditions about it

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's weirder that there's a phenomenon that happens particularly in one nation that claims nothing can be done about the phenomenon.

well everything about american politics makes sense when you consider that the US constitution is just a bad basis for a country

the government just shutting down on a semi-regular basis for example. That's very disfunctional and not normal

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›