this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
445 points (100.0% liked)

196

16489 readers
2509 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You make what you measure. They measured snakes.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you suppose they should have measured instead? Honestly I'm coming up blank.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Probably could've just employed people, with one of their responsibilities being to manage the cobra population — not tying their pay to how many cobras they killed.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Same thing was said about French colonial forces and the Vietnamese but with rats instead of snakes.

[–] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

That'd be because it's an anecdotal myth with little/no evidence showing that it actually happened.

[–] Pog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Iirc there's no evidence of this actually happening, could be an old folktale for all we know lol

[–] turnleftist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Like all cute stories that justify markets, it's fake lol

[–] JoShmoe@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love the colonial britain getting hustled. But how does having increased cobras benefit India?

[–] Meganium97@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago

It did not, that was the point.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] JoShmoe@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Now we’re talking.