this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1111 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
6229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phero@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I guess the rich don’t have an energy crisis.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

AI needs that's much power?

Fuck you, ditch it like a Zune and make some more video games.

[–] query@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I don't get why a train AI would need so much power, how hard is it to drive a train?

Will the nuclear reactors be on the train with the AI, or will it be some sort of wired transfer?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not opposed to new nuclear energy in principle. However Microsoft, an unrelentingly bad organization that consistently acts in bad faith to its customers, employees and businesses parters, and is seemingly dedicated to making awful products that never meaningfully improve, is not something I would trust to do nuclear safely.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] query@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AI's going to kill us off by doing what we do better than us. Consuming resources and producing waste. And we're already pretty good at it.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Microsoft has invested in several fusion projects too.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Mega corporations should not be allowed to use nuclear power plants purely for themselves.

Also, if you need that much power to do something bthat a human brain does with under 100 watts, I really think you're doing it wrong

[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The whole language model scene system started with "we accidently found something that kinda works" and is now in full "somebody please accidently find a way so it uses less power" mode.

[–] Deiv@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why should they not be allowed? Nuclear power plants are great options and will mean less demand on worse energy providing sources

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because safety and profits aren't going in the same direction. They would cut corner for reduce the costs. Which is how you end with a nuclear accident. And then it would be to the tax payer to kick the bill.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›