this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
218 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9723 readers
1042 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't the pods have a door? I mean, if I am paying for it, I at least want to be able to lock it.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You can rent a door for $10/night

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And last month this was just a meme...

They have these in Japan as hotels, and they are expensive. It works pretty nicely for that, but renting them as a permanent dwelling is insane...

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It won't be long before they are not allowed to quit their job or leave the area. Welcome to Neo-Digital-Feudalism. History rhymes.

[–] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

The standard ones were like $35/night last I checked. Not exactly expensive. Housing (at least in 2017) was fairly cheap in Tokyo and the rest of Japan compared to most countries.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The bizarre thing about this is that the media and tech companies are pretending this is because these people WANT to live in pods.

Not because they can't afford anything, even when they have tech jobs that should mean they get paid well.

[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the American dream for all your possessions to fit in a backpack so you can be the salaried unhoused.

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

No possessions, only consume!

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not how this article reads to me. It even mentions high rent is driving the demand.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say this article was portraying it as such.

But in general the media and companies do. This "pod people" and "20 people sharing a 2 bedroom" thing has been in the news on and off for a few years already.

[–] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I didn't think ya were! Sorry I probably should've put a /s there or something, absolutely agree! β™₯

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

i thought it would be like those japanese sleep pods but these dont even have a door 😭

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's time. This is only going to get worse. (And this is not a call to violence, but reform. Please don't misunderstand, and hear me out - I use the words of those wiser than me, and wish to share what I have learned.)

We have tried to act by silent manipulation - a perfectly valid way of exercising our will. But we have failed. In attempting to exercise our will in a way synchronous to those more powerful than us, we have instead allowed them to build us into another herd morality - one of willing slavery. This can stand no longer. Violence against those weaker than you may be a sign of weakness, but using it as the last resort to escape those acting counter to your most basic needs may soon become the only way out.

We must act now. We must wait no longer, or soon there may be no alternative to violent revolt. I fear it may be too late. But in the struggle for the power to control your own life, any means required to exercise that will is justified. They are weak in will, and in their weakness, they resort to the illusion of strength that comes from squashing us under their feet.

They fight for themselves and their own will to power. I respect that - but they have made a fatal mistake, and shown their weakness by resorting to a show of force against us. It is this:

There are two ways to exercise your will over another: to annihilate them, and continue on as one force behind your will. Or to build them up, and change their life for the better - to make them a better, stronger person.

The former is what the aristocrats choose. It carries a great illusion of strength. But the latter is how we must fight - while they trample one another, we must strengthen each other. Though we disagree on how to exercise it, we share a common will: change. If we work together to accomplish that, rather than fight like they do, we can overcome their power easily.

Reshaping another's will by empowering each other is far more potent than fighting each other. In doing so, as a being of will, you make them indebted to you. And that helps orient their will towards yours. And that is how you achieve true power - by starting a movement. One that can shape the very universe to your will.

I have not started a movement. But I see that this movement is in line with my will. So I will add my small power to it, and seek to add more. We have no name or banner. Or rather, we have too many to reconcile. That is good. Instead of fighting for whose details and name should be plastered on a useless surge of will, let's all join under whatever banner we choose to fly (and I fly only my own just as many of you), and come together to spark the fire of action.

The revolution began long ago. Perhaps it has burned since the beginning of time, recurring forever, and will never truly end until the universe collapses and our eternal will is ended.

But perhaps in fighting, we can join something eternal. Something not reliant on faith or platonic idealism, but rather a tangible effect that repeats until time itself is extinguished.

I choose to join. I ask you to as well. Join us - join the force, with no name or banner, but a common goal - and live, through your will, forever.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

All of this!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Eeesh. Just get a van and convert it. Park at work. Gym membership for showers.

[–] llama@midwest.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DMV: "Sir your van cannot be registered using itself as the address"

[–] lateraltwo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Sir, the owners' property protection bill of 2035 requires you to have a permanent address to register a motor vehicle or bicycle, PO boxes don't fulfill that requirement. In-office bed cubicles are sufficient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Here’s a fun thought.

What happens to all these people living in sarcophagi (TIL that’s a real word) when another pandemic/lockdown happen? Do they just go into solitary confinement conditions worse than actual solitary confinement in terms of square footage?

Asking for a friend that happens to be everyone in New York who isn’t rich

I stayed in a capsule hotel in Tokyo once. It was awful.

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seems cleaner, but similar to the kind of places I lived while getting into tech in SF (maybe ~8 months total)... I have some pretty interesting stories from that time lol. But extra hilarious was years later seeing a dystopian article about one of the very places I had lived (had it down to the Pinterest dev living in the closet):

https://www.salon.com/2016/09/17/hacker-house-blues-my-life-with-12-programmers-2-rooms-and-one-21st-century-dream/

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Los Angeles bases its occupancy limits on the square footage of a unit, rather than the number of bedrooms:

- One to two people for every 70–119 square feet
- Three people for every 120–169 square feet
- Four people for every 170–119 square feet
- 50 square feet for each additional person

I guess $23 and some change daily compares favorably, cost wise, with just getting a hotel room. But me -- I'll take the hotel room, thanks.

[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

700$ a month!? I mean if this is what it takes to keep more people from slipping through the cracks into homelessness I'm all for it, but fuck the whole system that got us to this point.

[–] FatAdama@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

What could possibly go wrong? Such a terrible idea. I hope they have some safety measures in place to prevent sexual assault.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Beats a studio in rural New Hampshire.

[–] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Of course the startup behind it is called "Brownstone"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] beefcat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why would someone choose this over living literally anywhere else?

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Proximity/price and community. Anything in SF proper is going to be, at minimum, 2-3x more expensive. To get this kind of price, you'd need to commute from outside the city.

Re community, the people that live at this kind of place are generally grinding super hard in the tech industry. So trying to live with like-minded workaholics in the same stage of life.

Source: I have lived in SF and east bay, both in places like this, and renting an apt the normal way.

[–] Lycerius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That website is a disaster. Endless pop up ads that play sound and constantly interrupt your reading. How does anyone use it?

[–] odium@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On Firefox android with u block origin, I get a total of 0 ads, pop ups, sounds, etc.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί