this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
731 points (92.5% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4759 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A horde of trailer-park visigoths can sack the Capitol and Republicans say "what's the big deal?" But let one guy show up in casual clothes and they lose their goddamn minds.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 207 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

He can do it in a bikini, for all I care. Let’s not pretend Congress stands on decorum now.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or tradition. Or morals. Or principals. Or anything at all really. They just suck.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago

I mean I suppose it doesn't stand on principals, either...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whodatdair@lemm.ee 49 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Didn’t one of them literally bring a big giant card with a photo of the president’s son’s dick on it for their speaking time?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Fascism has always been big on dressing fancy.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 163 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“If those jagoffs in the House stop trying to shut our government down, and fully support Ukraine, then I will save democracy by wearing a suit on the Senate floor next week.”

Lol, go git em Fetterman

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He added "Wouldya rather have a yinzer or an asshole up here? Your choice."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 124 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is a losing issue for Republicans.

Do they think their base gives a shit about dress codes? Obviously not! But the fancy lads can't stand the thought of people not dressing correctly lol

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 89 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their base will get offended over anything & everything so long as it's not one of their own being criticized. They are forever hypocrites, and generally dumber than a box of rocks.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eh, the base will forget about this in a week if its not right in front of their faces on TV. It's just not something they actually care about.

Some issues ignite a fire in the base and sustain themselves, like racism and queerphobia, but dress codes ain't it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

Something something tan suit!

[–] StarServal@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They don’t give a shit about dress code. They give a shit about having an excuse to be angry about something.

I guarantee if some GOPer showed up in a stained wifebeater with camo shorts and crocs, they would be celebrated as ‘just like us’ and ‘a hero of the people.’

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"we must protect the sanctity of that place at all costs"

I fucking refuse to hear Republicans speak of sanctity after the shit they've pulled since 2015.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The sanctity of this place has been fouled.

-- John Fetterman and the warrior from Diablo 1

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago

As she looked up from the crotch of the man she was manually ejaculating in public, Ms. Boebert was quoted as saying, "shorts is so bad, it's such disrespectful to the government and stuff".

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm just here to upvote the phrase 'trailer-park visigoths'. Carry on.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 20 points 11 months ago

I like it, it has some metaphorical levels, but I'm torn because Rome definitely had it coming.

Hell, did you know the Visigoths allowed women to inherit property and noble titles? They were the woke mob destroying the literal patriarchy by 410 AD standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don’t give a fuck. What are we doing about the worthless traitor filth who salivate at the thought of installing a dictator?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Destroying Democracy = A-okay!

Not wearing a suit = Unimaginably evil!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Why do people care what they wear when congress is fucking us over regardless?

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago

Because without the illusion of decorum putting a degree of separation between the common man and the senator, people might start to realize that the ones fucking them over are just as regular as the rest of us and maybe start to think about doing something about it.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago

I think that's pretty much Fetterman's point. Well, that and that he'll wear whatever he damn well pleases.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So what, Ted Cruz is usually wearing a bodysuit out of human skin and nobody bats an eye.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's go back to powdered wigs, knickers and coat tails. I'm sure Mitch McConnel remembers those.

[–] instamat@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Mr McConnell, would you care to comment?”

“Well—”

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

How about this tasty lettuce leaf?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Disgusting.

How could Schumer let somebody who OBVIOUSLY skips leg day preside over the senate?

What kind of example is he setting for the kids? How can I be expected to get my son to pound out squats to exhaustion before school if THIS is supposed to be a role model?

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (6 children)

well, Obama once wore a beige suit 😯

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Dailywire is absolute trash anyway

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Daily Wire is doing fashion coverage now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get that this guy rolls how he wants to roll but I just wish someone would buy him clothes that fit. They can be cool clothes, shorts and whatever, put on a hoodie, that's all rad but just make it fit

[–] dyma@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he has such a strange body though he'd probably need to get something tailored, which kinda defeats the point of his style to relate average Americans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I get making the dress code more lax, no reason business casual should be unacceptable. And yeah, Republicunts are hypocrits as always. But are we sure about no dress code at all? People joke in this thread about congressfolks showing up in fursuits or banana slings, but how long is it until someone actually unironically tries that?

[–] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (12 children)

And the harm would be exactly what?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

They are angry they didn't think of it first and some working class people could be thinking hmmm this guy dresses like me maybe he isn't so bad like republicans say.

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Well shoot, if this keeps up they might have to start trying to judge people by the content of their character instead of just their virtue signaling. Do you know how fast the system would fall apart if voters actually had to figure out what kind of person their representatives were?

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Elect me to congress and I'll show up to the first session after my swearing-in wearing a $10,000 full-body fursuit, and I'll use my own money to buy it, not a single cent of taxpayer funding required.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Imagine thinking clothing is what makes one deserving of respect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolfeh@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (10 children)

This is wonderful. That being said, why are we linking to The Daily Wire?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm surprised nobody showed up as a furry, or at the very least Boebert in a banana sling.

Let's show some guts damnit

[–] Asifall@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He should wear a tie over a vee neck just to fuck with them

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I think he should wear one of these.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay. I have to say, I don't like the idea of making the US Senate more casual. Fetterman should be wearing a shirt and pants.

However, as far as I understand, this is still the Republicans fault for not being able to agree on what the wording of the rule regarding what clothing is appropriate. So if they don't like Fetterman's outfits, they still have themselves to blame here.

Probably an unpopular opinion but I stand by it.

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I think there is some value in dressing nice and decorum. The same way we dress nice for family dinner or wear business casual to work even though there might be no dress code, it shows respect. That being said, if anyone is outraged at this then they completely lost the track. We're long way past the point of caring about "decorum" in the senate. Dressing nice is like that nice little cherry on top of the sundae, it does not fucking matter if the sundae is made of literal shit.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›