this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
476 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fetterman is nothing if not amusing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 237 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Why does Fetterman, the largest senator, not simply eat the other senators?

[–] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That's awesome, as is everything I know about fetterman.

It is very strange how much life has changed since even this extremely dated reference was made.

My kid just started kindergarten. The principal and some of his teachers have visible tattoos.

My kindergarten teacher was an ex nun who refused to let me write with my left hand.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I heard your senator went into the senate and ate everything in the senate and they had to close the senate!

[–] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Am I out of touch?

No! the constituents are wrong!

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I yield the rest of my thyme.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They must be saving that for Sweeps Week.

[–] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He already started, this is why he is the size of two mortal men. He hasn’t reached his final form

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 111 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I sometimes wonder if I live in an alternate reality where a significant subsection of the population has gone absolutely insane. The insanity all seemed to take off around 2016.

[–] billy_bollocks@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 year ago

I blame social media. Mainlining outrage and confirmation bias through your smart phone is one hell of a way to get high

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There's a town hall video with John McCain around 2008 where an elderly woman tries to suggest to him she's worried about Obama because he's not white. John McCain shot her down and defended Obama and stressed we should only focus on the political differences of opinion, and his own supporters booed him. This all had been coming for so long.

Edit: I was corrected, she did not exactly state what her problem was with Obama, but it's clear that it was bigotry.

[–] JamesBean@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're thinking of the same clip, you're slightly misremembering it. The woman was insisting Obama was a Muslim, and that's what McCain was shutting down. But yes, the crowd booed him for clarifying that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dmonzel@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It actually started really ramping up in 2008-2009. Tea Party, birthers, so on. It's amazing what happens when someone who wasn't white was elected president.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It actually started with Newt and his bullshit back in '96....well, actually it started with fucking Reagan and his trickle down bullshit beack in '80...then again, maybe it started when

[–] agentsquirrel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

This is the correct answer. It's just that the crazies, racists, and terrorists in the Republican party stopped being scared to come out in public around 2008 and even more in 2016.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sometimes I think the end of the world actually did happen in 2012, it's just that the fallout is happening over a longer time scale than anyone anticipated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

As someone who came of age during Reagan's presidency, y'all just ain't been around long enough.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The most soul crushing part is when you realize it’s not an alternate reality; this is where you’ve been all along and you feel betrayed by everyone you’ve ever known for hiding it from you, even about their own stupidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raise_a_glass@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a weird coincidence a show came out in 2016 before the election called BrainDead and the plot was that alien bugs are eating parts of our brains and causing hyper partisanship.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrainDead

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I wish we had more of him. The OG can stay in PA and make a clone to be senator for every other state. I know I'd vote for him.

Why the fuck can't we get more elected Democrats like him? He's personable. He's down to earth, and he's willing to make fun of the right wing wackos instead of cowering in fear. A good 3/4 of all the other elected Dems are a bunch of pussies who have the wit of a goddamn potato.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We could at the very least split him and have two normally sized fettermen.

[–] ChlorineAddict@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Why does Fetterman, the largest Senator, simply not eat the other 99?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Because at the heart of it most of them are still spineless corporate shills. Fetterman, AOC, Russ Feingold etc are outliers who snuck past the checks

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the whole damn system is designed to weed out anyone like that before they can even sniff at a senate seat.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

And yet here we are with him in Congress. So it actually is possible.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because Democratic primary voters are gigantic cowards who think swing voters are only won over by inoffensive white corporate suits.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone making season 6 Simpson references should be immediately put in charge of everything.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Come one over to /c/thesimpsons where we constantly play differing difficulties of "Guess The Episode" based on screen shots.

Love that shit. I rarely have even the faintest idea what the answer is but I still have fun thinking about it. Haven't seen the Simpsons since it initially aired so the mind's a bit fuzzy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] appel@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago

Can I just note, at the risk of venturing slightly off topic, that Fetterman is rocking that stash?

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I'm sure there are plenty of body doubles available out there for 6' 8" dudes with incredibly distinct facial features and skull geometry that would keep a 19th century phrenologist in business for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

By this time next year we should 8 ~~Fettermans~~ Fettermen. And they, too, will be Senators. Then 16, 32, 64, 128 et celery et celery.

Soon ... no more Senators. Only Settermen.

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure the plural is Johns Fetterman. It's like Attorneys General.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As opposed to the possessive plural Attorneys' Genitals.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fetterman for VP.

Him and Biden together would be comedy gold.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

VP? Fetterman for Pres! Biden can be his VP. you know. to help mentor and guide him.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fetterman and his wife continue to impress me with how good at social media they are.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gisele Fetterman is a secret weapon and almost as funny as the Senator

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Crazy how gop found so many people with the shame part of their brain disabled

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How has he not had Terry Crews be his body double yet?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

Imagine not understanding the difference between inner forearms and outer forearms...

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be fair, Krusty the Clown and Homer Simpson are body doubles. Maybe there's a cynical clown version of John Fetterman somewhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›