this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)

Programming

17344 readers
150 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, I know so much of Alpine's lightweightness comes from not using glibc.

But still, the other options I see are far from being slimmed down. Debian, Ubuntu server, CentOS... They all could use some cuts.

What's the most slimmed down non-desktop distro that still has a glibc base? I honestly don't care if it has its own package manager (build tool handles this for me). Just wanna use it in containers for running server apps.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] realharo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago
[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

I assume with "non-desktop" you mean "container" and not, say, server or embedded? In that case Wolfi is a candidate.

https://github.com/wolfi-dev

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What runtime do you need? If it’s Node.js, the “slim” Docker images are lightweight and based on Debian. (for example node:lts-slim)

[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

250mb is a curios interpretation of "lightweight"

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Standard node images are around 1 GB. node:lts-alpine is about 176 MB. So it’s fairly close to alpine in this case.

[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but it you consider that 166MB of that is for the node part alone, the "slim" image ships 80MB of stuff to basically do nothing

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be interesting to see what the difference is. The slim image doesn’t even have vi installed, although it does have bash. And of course, git, etc. are not present. Much of the difference could be the size difference between musl and libc, and the size difference between apk and apt metadata.

I don’t think OP is going to find a non-musl distro as small as Alpine. These stripped-down Debians are a lot bigger, but among the smallest non-Alpine that you’ll find.

[–] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

The Wolfi based chainguard images for node are glibc based and come in at 111mb, so its definitely possible.

[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

May be worth looking at distroless containers.

[–] tutor5051@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago
[–] a-man-from-earth@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can completely customize Gentoo Linux to be what you want it to be and slim it down to what you need.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

My experience with gentoo docker images is that they're pretty big. I'm not sure why. Maybe the build system or the python deps make it big. I tried squashing the image layers and it was still big, so it isn't that.