this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
207 points (99.1% liked)

Linux

48315 readers
852 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Started learning Linux with Manjaro a few years ago, but there were always stability issues pushing me away from daily driving. I found when I did have time to use my PC, it was largely for gaming, and when any issue presented and needed to be fixed it was a bit of a barrier to entry.

Because of biases I always leaned to Arch for that 'bleeding edge' and rolling updates, so when I gave Linux another shot long term a few months ago I went with EndeavourOS. Everything was rock solid but I found a lot of nitpicks and after a week or so my monitors wouldn't wake from sleep... I of course don't blame the OS as more than likely there was a log somewhere explaining my issue, but I really just want to enjoy playing games after a long day.

So I gave up on my faux dream of living on the edge and instead installed Pop_OS!, and to my pleasant surprise it has been rock solid and performant to boot! My preconceived biases against Debian and it's derivatives drove me to borderline tribalism. Flatpak has remedied worries of outdated packages, and even if I did have an issue (bluetooth headphones defaulting to HSP not AD2P) I found the solution on the archwiki!

The beauty of this ecosystem is that Linux is Linux, we all benefit from improvements so long as they are made open and free, and no matter what flavor you choose, you'll always be part of the family.

Thanks for reading, and thank you to the contributors who work tirelessly to make an open and free desktop a reality :)

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BitSound@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I found the solution on the archwiki!

Never used Arch before in my life, but the wiki is great. Rising tide lifts all boats and all that jazz

[–] Cornelius@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Bless the Arch wiki and everyone who has contributed to it

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Gentoo wiki is good too

[–] clif@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the club, good to have you.

Cookies and coffee are in the break room.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Good on you. It's about finding what works for you, not what other people think it's cool.

I've been playing with Linux for nearly 30 years and never used Arch or Gentoo for daily work. It's fun to try, you learn a lot by tinkering, breaking and fixing stuff. But what you really need every day is a solid boring stable distro to get things done.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Welcome to the club, we're glad to have you.

I wish manjaro wasn't so highly recommended to new users. It kept me from fully migrating due to stability issues that I thought were representative of Linux as a whole, but just aren't.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I agree. Manjaro gives people a poor impression of Linux in general and Arch in particular.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

Manjaro was the first distro for me where everything worked out of the box and everything was stable. I used it for 2 years and now I'm on nobara.

I tried mint but wifi didn't work, I tried Endeavor but wifi didn't work and it ran and looked like shit. Tried Ubuntu but I didn't like the name. Tried arch but I couldn't set it up.

[–] boerbiet@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

Welcome 🙂. I always loved bleeding edge so Arch really suits me well. There's probably a distro out there for everyone and you seemingly have found yours!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 1 year ago

Good work picking PopOS, it's the one I recommend to everyone too.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know, I started with Pop! when I changed my gaming rig over a couple years ago. I always said I'd change over to something else, like Arch, which I use on other systems.

But Pop! has been surprisingly good. It's a nice mix of stability and ability to swap out parts without issue. For example, I use the Liquorix kernel (similar goal to Arch's Zen kernel) instead of the default Pop! kernel without any issue at all.

So I've just never changed it. I update of course but it's the same original install it's always been. Great experience.

[–] OldPain@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you're gaming on Linux I can't recommend Nobara enough. Optimized from the kernel out for gaming and based on Fedora. It autoinstalls graphics drivers on first boot, includes steam, lutris, proton, wine, and everything else you need to play out of the box. Also has Proton-Up, so you have a nice little easy GUI way to install the latest Proton versions. Developed by GloriousEggroll of GE-Proton fame.

For reference, I use a 3060 and play most games in 4K@144hz at medium-highest settings comfortably. I also run a second monitor which Nobara handles seemlessly, so good to go for Multi-Display setups too.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have been looking at Nobara. But I do wonder about impending issues with Fedora (on which it is based), and I also really like the custom version of Gnome that System76 worked out for Pop.

I use Proton-Up as well, and your performance sounds similar to mine.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

What impending issues worry you?

[–] eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net 7 points 1 year ago

Your rationale for going Pop was my exact one. I knew I wanted the bleeding edge, but this was a device I was going to (mostly) daily drive. I wanted it to be reliable. And Pop fixed that for me and didn't force my hand with shoving Snaps down my throat.

Glad to have another join the ranks!

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Compared to almost all other distros, Arch is advanced in the way that it's the simplest of them all. Nothing except the very basics are set up for you, so it's tough to start with.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

PopOS is the one that finally made me a Linux fulltimer too, after 15ish years. Welcome!

[–] Ironfist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

one of us! one of us!

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I've been experimenting with Raspbian and RPi compatible distros. Now I needed a PC for some self hosting stuff. I tried Debian and arch with not much success. Tonight I installed Mint then PhotoPrism without a terminal error that I need to google for solution! Even the video card is detected. Everything worked and now it's chugging away doing all the work instead of me troubleshooting.

[–] init@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I've been on PopOS for about 2 years now. I did have to dual boot windows about 6 months ago because the Sunshine streaming server refused to work consistently on linux, and I lacked the experience to properly diagnose why the issue was happening.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I multibox so the overhead of a compatibility layer and the sheer power required to run windowed (for some fucking reason) to keep full screens from minimizing on focus loss has forced me to run windows again. Being able to tab out but not being able to tab back into something that launched from a game launcher is an extra special fuck you.

For me linux is way to much of a hassle right now. I'm looking to offload my arr stack onto my nas or jellyfin box because while I'm gaming, which is most of the time, I'm not sailing.

I don't see myself uninstalling Pop but it hardly feels like a daily driver anymore.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Raise the sails, we are going to high seas!

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

In my own use of Manjaro, I've found timeshift to be invaluable. If something breaks at a time when I can't deal with fixing it, I timeshift to a known good install, and get back to fixing whatever broke in the up-to-date snapshot later.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry for the bad experience Manjaro gave you with rolling release, and Flatpak sucks.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

*having 10 instances of qt sucks