this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
15 points (85.7% liked)

UK Politics

3068 readers
314 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merridew@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want to know.

Until it's actually election time, I don't want to know what their vision is.

They can't "Brexit" any harder than the Tories have, and if they say anything negative about the obvious deficiencies of Brexit ahead of the election, they give the Tories ammunition to drum up more tribal support.

Let the real-world consequences of Brexit play out and speak for themselves. For now.

[–] floppy@rabbitea.rs 5 points 1 year ago

They are probably right to stay silent on it, and probably not mention it when campaigning. Unfortunately a lot of their core voters supported Brexit, so they don't want to alienate them (see what happened last time when they lent their votes to the Tories).

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Any conversation that Labour has regarding Brexit is an opening for the Tory ERG to push their own twisted narrative. Since Tories control the media, then that will be the loudest voice. Labour will not fair well in that sort of fight. There are still plenty of idiots who do not accept the damage that Brexit is doing.

The latest yougov poll shows that:

If the 2016 referendum on UK membership of the European Union was being held now, how would you vote?

31% would still want to leave the EU, with only 55% would be voting to remain

If there was a referendum now on whether the UK should or should not join the European Union, how would you vote?

32% would be against with 51% would be for it

So for all a lot of the country is aware how damaging our Brexit stance it, this is not really enough. We cannot convince anymore due to the strength of Tory media. The only way Starmer can beat this is by giving facts when in government. While keeping in mind that we will only ever get one chance to reverse this fiasco, would you rather it was done in haste or with as many educated as possible?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Depends who you ask, doesn’t it

  • the OBR have said it’s currently costing 4% of GDP per year and trade with the block is down 15%
  • 80% of touring musicians have said their income is affecting by new restrictions on working in the EU
  • travellers will tell you the delays at port of dover, when a critical incident was declared due to queues caused by increased processing time
  • the welsh government have said they’ll be down a billion quid over a 3 period after government failed to keep its promises of matches funding
  • scientists are bit more cheerful having dug themselves out of the shit just this week and regained access to science funding.

The list is as long as you want it to be, but it’s All by the by really, because the better question - since it was pitched as being to the betterment of the UK - what benefits has it delivered?

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

OK now show me a graph that actually involves Brexit. This is not comparing apples to apples. Only an idiot would buy into this.

The UK GDP fell off a cliff after the Brexit vote. So yes we may have had a unexpected difference in the GDP after that, but this does not deflect that Brexit has been massively damaging to our GDP.

UK GDP per capita in dollars: 2015 - 45,071 2016 - 41,146 2017 - 43,306

So by 2018 we had lost $2000 per head in the country. It is recorded that the wealth gap in the UK is now larger after Brexit than before. This means this has more of a significant impact to the poorer than to the rich. This does not count for inflation which is running wild. It does not count for the difference in energy costs which are affecting the UK more than our comparable in the EU, which Tories love to show a comparison to. What they never explain is that the likes of Germany, The Netherlands and France are also trying to recover from the affects of Brexit. Their economy would also be so much better off. Brexit did not just hurt the UK alone.

My earlier post spoke of the twisted narrative that is spouted from the Tories trying to corrupt thinking in the UK. You sir, are it.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nope,

OBR says 4% of productivity, not GDP, over 15 years. Please show me a chart that shows GDP down by 4% per year. We'd be absolutely fucked if so.

Trade of what is down 15%? Source?

EU offered the UK a visa scheme for musicians, so that's all on the Tories

Yep, there's delays at every EU border, they've been promising a digital customs window since the 1990's...but the UK has caused its own issues there, fair dos

Tories not keeping promises to Wales is not down to brexit, it's down to the Tories.

All science funding has continued, it has just come out of UK govt pocket not EU...

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I forgot how you guys think.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not about thinking, it's about facts.

Here's UK EU trade since 1999, goods and services are at all time highs

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they don't want to piss off their voter base so they wonttsay anything and continue the Tory policy of making the best out of a shite situation?

[–] merridew@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tory policy of making a shite situation out of the best

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Or that 🤣

[–] pre@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago

In the first term of a Labour government they will maybe be a bit less hostile towards the EU but they won't be re-joining or anything. They'll have no mandate to do so since they worry putting it in a manefesto would alienate their red-wall voters.

As it currently looks Labour won't do much of anything at all. Continue tory spending plans, refuse to raise any taxes, not rebuild any schools, not make any changes which may affect the social order or reform capitalism in any way.

Expect 4 years of calm with almost nothing happening. Which in itself will be quite a relief.

[–] alchemy88@lemmy.team 3 points 1 year ago

I think they'll push to join the customs union

[–] snipvoid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

With ol’ Keir ‘industry plant’ Starmer at the helm? Not a single useful thing.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Whatever the rich people they serve tell them to