The better solution is to have not created the problem to begin with. It is an awesome possibility to undo the date that we've done, but it doesn't give us a pass to continue doing what we're doing. Like saying "We can keep making all the trash we do cause we just burn it! Isn't it great?"
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2022
15 points (100.0% liked)
Green - An environmentalist community
5310 readers
2 users here now
This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!
RULES:
1- Remember the human
2- Link posts should come from a reputable source
3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith
Related communities:
- /c/collapse
- /c/antreefa
- /c/gardening
- /c/eco_socialism@lemmygrad.ml
- /c/biology
- /c/criseciv
- /c/eco
- /c/environment@beehaw.org
- SLRPNK
Unofficial Chat rooms:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
This. Bioremediation has promising potential but as someone who has done bioremediation research in various applications..... your comment reflects how I wish more people would think. Far too many people interpret advancements like this as a free pass to continue practices terrible for the environment.
IMO, bioremediation is basically being hijacked by corporate polluters (oil companies) trying to greenwash their products.
I agree with this!
Is this the most sustainable option?
I don't know. I found this this to be an interesting read, so I thought to share with everyone here.