this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
203 points (95.1% liked)

World News

32285 readers
789 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MarcoPolpo@lemmy.ml 128 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've seen worse ads about perfume

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On one hand, I find nothing wrong with the photograph.

On the other hand, I’m sick of fucking OnlyFans spam online, it’s disgusting to see more spam in real life.

Also billboards as a whole can get fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CraigeryTheKid@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Remember jeans ads from the 90s? Jeans were all they had on!

[–] z500@startrek.website 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In the 2000s women were straight up having orgasms in shampoo commercials.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

French guys 40 upwards were having their first orgasm to shampoo adverts

[–] Mannimarco@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Those were the days, B&W pictures of coked-up anorexic Calvin Klein jeans models shot topless from the back with maybe a bit of sideboob depending on where they put their arm.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But is it about what’s directly on the billboard, or about what it’s advertising?

Like, Pornhub could make a billboard with nothing risqué on it, but the fact that it’s advertising a porn website would be an issue wouldn’t it?

Maybe not, I’m just curious tbh.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A billboard would have just 'Hub' written in a yellow rectangle and we'd know what it is lmao.

[–] Wookie@artemis.camp 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Netflix has some of the raunchiest posters I’ve ever seen

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's no different than seeing a Victoria's Secret or Calvin Klein billboard, IMHO.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's completely tame. There are far more sexual images in just about any direction. It's only because people know there's actual nakedness being advertised that anyone has a problem with it. And that's just silly.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Victoria's Secret

I gotchu

Queen Victoria and her husband (and also her cousin) Prince Albert popularized the custom of Christmas Trees in 1848 when Albert sent decorated trees to schools and army barracks around Windsor.

Prince Albert was apparently hung like a horse.

[–] venusenvy47@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm ignorant about what content OnlyFans has. Is the woman on the billboard a porn star?

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OnlyFans is generally a porn distribution platform, yes. It was created with wider intent, but was taken over by amateur porn makers. You basically sign up for free, then you subscribe to people you wanna jerk off to or whatever. some accounts are free, some are paid, most offer paid content on the side, like custom requests or old videos. I help one of my friends make content for her OF account here and there; I'm happy to answer questions you have about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fhek@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not only did the billboard work, but now that news outlets are posting it, with her @ and all, she’s likely getting so much more attention/subs.

Genius.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it a good or a bad thing when you're told your onlyfans ad can stay because it's not sexy enough?

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It can be sexy without being sexual

[–] Fantomas@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah. Like really good pizza.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really fuckable pizza hnmmnnnnnn 🍕❤️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

It is sexual, but not overtly sexual.

I think she'd be proud she nailed the legally distinct line between selling sex and sex sells.

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Come to Denmark where we have advertising on busses with full on boobs in full show. It's advertiseing for breast implants btw

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Environmental activists Global Witness later took over three of the poster sites and transformed them into ‘OilyFans’ billboards, to comment on the pay package of BP chief executive Bernard Looney, whose earnings went from £4.5 million (€5.2 million) to £10 million (€11.6 million) last year.

Good bit

[–] mercury@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only problem with this is the fact that it's an advertisement. At least in the US, you cant drive down a country highway without seeing at least one advertisement for a strip club.

[–] manny_stillwagon@kbin.run 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can in Vermont and Hawaii, where billboards are illegal.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Hey, I did notice that driving down in Vermont, it makes for such clean looking highways and cities! We need to bring this regulation to Quebec.

[–] raistlin@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Maine has a similar law too I believe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who are these people that pay for pornography?

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who are the people who pay for netflix instead of torrenting?

Someone has to.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They consulted Twitch mods and they said it's ok.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Billboards erected in London showing model Eliza Rose Watson in underwear advertising her OnlyFans account page have been cleared by the UK regulator following complaints that they were inappropriate for children to see.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 30 complaints stating that the posters seen in Harrow, Tottenham, Lambeth and Edgware in June and July featured adult content and were inappropriate.

ASA said that although Watson’s clothing was revealing, the image did not feature any nudity, and the pose adopted by her was “no more than mildly sexual."

“While we acknowledged that the image of Ms Watson and reference to OnlyFans might be distasteful to some, we considered that because the ad was not overtly sexual and did not objectify women, we therefore concluded it was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.”

The ASA continued: “The ad was shown on several posters throughout London, which was an untargeted medium, and was therefore likely to be seen by a large number of people, including children.”

Commenting on the reaction to the billboards, she said: "If people are offended by my ad, I'm assuming they're also complaining about Ann Summers and Jack Daniels ones.


The original article contains 408 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Summary fails to mention who the billboards erected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mandy@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

If being on onlyfans constitues being a model now than I am a highly esteemed 3d enviromental designer

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Heh heh heh. They said “erected”.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So it's like, a porn advert? I kind of assumed that wasn't a thing.

load more comments
view more: next ›