Music Theory and White Supremacy : music

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay - walking the plank time...

I'm not - yet - aware of any sound manipulation more sophisticated than that of the Western Classical Music tradition. But neither am I prepared to be branded with the title "white (male) supremacist".

I'm happy to concede that there might be more sophisticated musics of other times or places that we don't know about or have forgotten. But it should also be conceded that musicians of all races, religions and genders are free to contribute to the canon, and that they do so.

It might in fact be argued, that Western Classical Music became just sophisticated enough to disappear up its own... cul-de-sac, in the 1920s, when Schoenberg published his Op. 23.

It's also certainly the case that the first recordings of monophonic 12-bar-blues in the '30s represents a significant devaluation of the currency - it being essentially from the same stable as the Western Classical tradition in terms of modality, metre, time signature and strophic structure.

[–] pinknoise@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you somewhat miss the point. Music isn't objective and can be analysed (sub- or objectively) in many "dimensions". Words like "sophistication" are useless in such a context if they aren't bound to actual parameters.

Thats a big part of the video, (classical) music theory isn't an empirical science but only a frame of reference to describe, understand and create the complex phenomenon of music and its perception by humans. There are many such frames, that can be used to do all of or only a subset of the aforementioned.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sound manipulation is sound manipulation - it's tuned and/or un-tuned events happening over a dedicated period of time.

And I think that a set of metrics can be applied, regardless of time or location. Music elements will always be -

Rhythm
Modality
Melody
Harmony
Texture
Timbre
Form and
Expression

Edit And yes - a four-part fugue is empirically more sophisticated than an unaccompanied song.

[–] pinknoise@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

it's tuned and/or un-tuned events happening over a dedicated period of time

I think this is too specific for a general definition of music, but finding a better one might get quite philosophical. What constitutes an event? Does this apply to the limits of "a period of time"? lf events can both be tuned and untuned, why should that matter for the definition?

And I think that a set of metrics can be applied

Yes but they are not the only ones and quite arbitrary, and classical music theory isn't the only or even a particularily good way to describe them. The metrics you mentioned are often further concentrated into timbre, harmony and rhythm. At such granular levels, it becomes clear, that the lines between those parameters where always blurry and classical theory can only describe them in a limited way.

Different composers, musicians and listeners value different things in musical experiences. Sophistication in music is a subjective measure. You can come to a meaningful result if you define it with measurable parameters. But that meaning is tied to the domain of those parameters and can't be applied to the piece as a whole.

a four-part fugue is empirically more sophisticated than an unaccompanied song.

Why?

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You could have a cheese roll for supper, or you could go out for a 5 course banquet... both are sustaining, but one is empirically more sophisticated than the other. On any given evening, you might prefer either over the other, and that's fine.

The metrics I listed constitute the elements of music - of course there are lots of detail within each. But they are what we use to appreciate music through analysis. What other metrics do you think there are?

I'd be happy to hear your philosophical definition of music... but I think mine is good enough. An event is when someone plucks a string or beats a drum. A period of time is the frame chosen from beginning of the music to the end of a piece : say 4'33".

[–] pinknoise@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You could have a cheese roll for supper, or you could go out for a 5 course banquet… both are sustaining, but one is empirically more sophisticated than the other.

Again, this is a matter of subjectivity. On closer inspection, there could be many intricacies in how to craft a good cheese roll. Raising the right cows in the right way, to give the right milk that with the right conditions will make the right cheese etc. At the same time it is possible to carelessly make a 5 course banquet while adhering to form. You can compare them on specific characteristics, but you can't make the blanket statement, that one is more sophisticated than the other.

The metrics I listed constitute the elements of music - of course there are lots of detail within each. But they are what we use to appreciate music through analysis.

The video is about classical music theory. It was originally created (over a long period of time, with all kinds of exchange with different cultures btw) by western composers through observation to formalize their musical language. It's parameters and methods come from practical considerations. There is no inherent value of a piece to be derived from them, only insight.

What other metrics do you think there are?

You can arbitrarily create new ones out of those you mentioned by combining and/or judging them in different ways.

E.g. we could measure timbral complexity by analyzing spectral composition, spectral dynamics or just number of instruments with distinct timbre used. Each of those might gain insight into the piece, but we can't derive an assertion like "white noise is empirically more sophisticated than someone playing a Stradivari".

Music also has cause, process, effect and sometimes an intention to be considered.

E.g. is the music of someone who is incredibly skilled at playing the piano more or less sophisticated than the music of someone incredibly skilled at building pianos exclusively for his pieces? Is a repetitive four-on-the-floor club-track that gets people to dance more or less sophisticated than an opera that fails to do so. Is a piece inherited and improved by many generations more or less sophisticated than one written in a weekend.

I’d be happy to hear your philosophical definition of music

The definition wouldn't be so philosophical, I meant the process of finding one that is agreeable would be.

E.g. "Act or means to cause a deliberate and often time-variant auditory sensation"

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

However sophisticated you make the process of building a cheese sandwich to be... a 5 course banquet can be at least five times the sophistication. It isn't subjective.

Timbral complexity is Timbre. Number of instruments and their particular register is Texture, and perhaps TImbral elements, such as the chalumeau register of a clarinet.

There is no music in building a piano - that's an altogether different craft, and one to be respected.

And if a "repetitive four-on-the-floor club-track" does the job, then it does the job. I'm not being a snob.

But I am done arguing about it.

[–] pinknoise@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

a 5 course banquet can be at least five times the sophistication.

I could serve 5 cheese sandwiches :D

Timbral complexity is Timbre

I just wanted to show that these parameters are kind of arbitrarily chosen and (sometimes) ill-defined. (E.g. whats the difference between an overtone spectrum and a harmony? Mostly just context.)

[–] x2ero@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

great video!

[–] erpicht@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Agreed! As someone who took AP Music Theory (because I perform 18th century music in an orchestra) I really enjoyed learning about the structure of the music I was playing.

One of the biggest hurdles to learning the basics of other music systems and styles is the amount of material available, however. Putting together and promoting good resources is a great way to enrich the knowledge and appreciation of other musical frameworks.

Learning about Renaissance lute music (performance and theory) is more difficult than learning about Baroque lute music, for example. Only because Diana Poulton wrote the fantastic A Tutor for the Renaissance Lute am I able to delve into it properly.

More generally, it's also difficult sometimes to convince people to even listen to anything out of their comfort zone (18th century German compositions absolutely can fall under category) such as Japanese koto music. There are some great pieces performed by Kimio Eto on Youtube, for any interested people.

I will note that it has never been easier to explore music than now, thanks to the ease of travel (until 2020 that is) and the internet. A lot of other composers are being uncovered, performed, and promoted now. For an example of this from 19th century England, check out Ethel Smyth. A great piece of hers to listen to is Serenade in D.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There isn't supremacy, it's loosing the context and sense of music, given it a more or less artistic flavor, but often without soul and feelings.

White people make music to entertain themselves, black people have music as a meaning of life

https://tube.cadence.moe/watch?v=lVPLIuBy9CY