3arn0wl

joined 4 years ago
[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

To be honest, most people don't give a thought to the OS they use. They haven't considered the ethics/politics. They've probably never even seen a Linux GUI. They bought a device with an OS preinstalled and, so long as it has the apps they want to use : that's fine. Heck! many of them are still on Vista.

The inertia preventing change (anything) is enormous (and even more so if you don't really understand something - like tech) : fundamentally, we're conservative, and lazy, (and frightened) as a species, and if something works... don't mess with it.

I am cautiously optimistic for Linux though, because I can see a couple of catalysts for a sea-change.

Firstly Windows11 - which increasingly relies on an internet connection, and a log in. I think this will bar Micro$oft from poorer communities. And I think it might make governments and businesses wonder what information they're mining.

Secondly the tech trade war - China is one of the biggest producers, if not the biggest producer of electronics, and they constitute 20% of the market too... And they're moving away from US proprietary systems : The electronics which are going to be coming out of China is going to have an Open Source OS.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Couldn't agree more!

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

These are the same well-rehearsed arguments that I've been making for over a year now.

I can't see the deal being allowed to go ahead - free trade, it seems, has its limits! :P

But whatever happens : Arm is the undisputed loser. Manufacturers will be questioning Arm's management, wondering just how stable the company is.

If the deal doesn't go ahead, Arm will either be floated, or some sort of consortium will be formed between those who use the ISA. In either case, Arm will need to seek out further funding, and compete for projects which are well-funded.

Meanwhile Arm are right to point out that RISC-V has spent the uncertainty maturing its ISA and gaining popularity with OEMs... It might not be too long before they aren't so reliant on ARM to develop their products.

IF the deal were to go ahead, Arm would be stripped for parts. And everyone will be putting in practice their contingency plan to go with RISC-V.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I much prefer the elegant kinetic beauty of wind turbines - especially in a cluster, to the ugly scar of a line of pylons: give me a turbine any day.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I absolutely agree with you!

What happens to Arm if the deal doesn't go ahead?

I think they're right to fear a flotation - the ROI has been surprisingly low for a company that's supposed to be worth US$40B... And Arm are looking to raise money, not produce profits just to give the money to investors.

Qualcomm's idea of users of the ISA clubbing together to maintain it - I guess more-or-less the Foundation model - might raise some money... but wouldn't that reduce Arm to custodians of the specification?

Arm could open source the ISA... That would probably consign RISC-V to the classroom... but it would diminish Arm Ltd. too.

: Chip designers for hire, and scrabbling for funding the next processor.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I would say that RISC-V is going to be competing in all areas, and possibly more quickly than many realise.

  • It's already competitive in the microcontroller arena
  • more capable processor designs are being worked on
  • There're hints of GPUs, and
  • RISC-V is competing in the emerging markets - going head-to-head with Arm.

The RISC-V Foundation increased by 133% last year, and with that came funding and greater visibility. The momentum seems to be with RISC-V, and ARM is in the doldrums.

 

How embarrassing for Arm that they are having to admit how weak they really are to all and sundry.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm obviously delighted to read an advert promoting Linux over Windows and MacOS from Computerworld, and agree with their reasoning. But I'm also a bit flabbergasted, to be honest!

I wish they had also mentioned all the data mining that we know goes on with Windows, and that we assume goes on with Apple's OSs too. How those OSs can be considered secure; I don't know.

I really hope companies, governments and individuals will at least consider deploying a Linux distribution over the next couple of years, rather than retiring their hardware, and signing up to Windows11.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah. Why not?

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Yes... I think that's probably the solution : find an old laptop, and flash something user-friendly onto it. Make sure it's got LibreOffice, a browser and an email client (if that's her thing).

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

This is a really good piece. Thank you for sharing it.

 

The PineNote seems to be coming on apace! Still a way off from being consumer-ready though.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

That's a truly astonishing graphic!

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Another vote for Nextcloud from me.

 

Being awarded to David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy, Stephen B. Furber, and Sophie M. Wilson “for contributions to the invention, development, and implementation of reduced instruction set computer (RISC) chips.

 

More than 50 Nobel laureates have signed an open letter calling for all countries to cut their military spending by 2% a year for the next five years, and put half the saved money in a UN fund to combat pandemics, the climate crisis, and extreme poverty.

Keep going, year on year, until no money is wasted - by any country - on military spending. That's what I say. Eliminating poverty and looking after the planet are much more noble endeavours than all the posturing and threats to eliminate each other.

For man at war with man, hears not the love song which they bring.

O hush your noise, ye men of strife, and hear the angels sing.

 

I agree with the conclusion: "if we want to have a habitable planet in the near future... we’re going to have to hold billionaires accountable for their excessive emissions in a real way."

 

Bangladesh, Samoa and Vanuatu advocated criminalizing environmental destruction during the annual meeting of the International Criminal Court in the Hague.

 

Plenty to see in the long-dark skies this month.

 

The UN’s intergovernmental panel on climate change says “Avoid, Shift, Improve” - and they're right.

 

I hope this ruling gives the UK government enough reason to change course, and that we will no longer have to live life under constant scrutiny. (I'm not holding my breath though)

 

I maintain that we all have a right to privacy, as inconvenient as that might be for our governors. So... another good move from the incoming administration in Germany.

 

About 290GW of new renewable energy generation capacity, mostly in the form of wind turbines and solar panels, has been installed around the world this year, beating the previous record last year. On current trends, renewable energy generating capacity will exceed that of fossil fuels and nuclear energy combined by 2026.

view more: next ›