this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
886 points (80.5% liked)

Memes

45725 readers
947 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eatmyass@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago (14 children)
[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] motherfucker@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago

User name relevant! Take my heckin updoot kind stranger!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The statement in the image is just loaded with terminology that comes with a lot of baggae. It's no surprise people tear into it. Can't speak to whether that makes them leftist or just poly sci students.

"Uncorrupt" misunderstands the nature of corruption. How do you envision resolving the interests of the forces that give validity to said government while still keeping a capitalist structure?

"Generate wealth" presupposes a specific kind of wealth created by the government and given validity by the capitalist structure. You win at the rules of the game you made up. "Middle class" has a similar problem. "Prosperity" to a nation starving under the global capitalist regime might look quite different. Why use one benchmark over the other? Because of the game you want to choose.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

Honestly, I think capitalism wouldn't be so bad if it was limited to what it's good at. Fashion, tech, entertainment, snacks, ect.

But essential food, housing, water, healthcare, even electricity and internet access, the idea that these things that will always have infinite demand is haphazardly controlled through profit motive is disgusting.

Infrastructures should be government controlled and free. Essential resources should have some sort of universal basic "food stamps" system. Then actual money just becomes the luxury "fun bucks" that you don't lose out on if you don't have a lot. For example pet owners would be given a credits for pet food and free vet care, but a silly pet costume would use money.

Disclaimer: This is just a personal idea I've been mulling over, I'm sure there's a million holes in it.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] atyaz@reddthat.com 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree! Let me know when you find an uncorrupt government or uncorrupt corporation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's weird. It's almost like educated people skew left. So very weird...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] temptest@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Lemmy has had a huge bias towards seize-the-means-of-production socialism from day 1, which is very important in understanding why it's different from other reddit clones, and why it has unique features and anti-features. The political orientation is not incidental, it's vital, and I'm glad to see it hasn't completely died from the sudden influx of reddit-natives when the API thing happened.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Neato@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Why do you want a middle class? So you have a class to aspire to and a class to denigrate? Why do you want classes?!

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] PZK@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

*Me saying a fairy tale scenario that will not exist under capitalism.

*Reality standing behind me.

You can't and wont deliver a long term solution for "middle class" people by working within that system. The goal of capital is ultimately to have as few as people as possible with as much power as possible. Any middle class you are talking about will become lower class and poverty class with enough time. It absurd that you can look at the current system and believe that it would ever deliver on your promise. Believing that it would work with an uncorrupt government is trying to say that there is an "ideal" version of capitalism out there and we just need to do that.

You are looking at the only version of capitalism that exists. Any regulations, safeguards, and safety nets will be corrupted and withered away eventually because the people and institutions that supposedly uphold these ideals will be rewarded for doing so. You create a competitive class system and you are shocked and outraged when people cash it out to gain, or maintain their social class to avoid becoming lower class.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eatmyass@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

Not biased enough, way too many liberals running around here

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

There are hardcore liberals around here too. That's what you get when there isn't an algorithm to promote fascists.

[–] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Me saying a market regulated by an uncorrupt government can generate wealth for many and generate a middle class.

Okay I know people might hate me for saying this, but isn't this just modern day China? Think about it:

  • While the government is definitely not uncorrupt and has many problems with corruption, Xi has introduced many corruption purges, and billionaires in China have actually faced legal consequences up to the death penalty. When is the last time a billionaire in the west actually faced legal consequences? (Just to be clear I am not pro death penalty, just illustrating a point).

  • China introduced markets with Deng and they are regulated by the government. Though this one is controversial among the left (quite a few Maoists think China could have achieved the same or even better results without the introduction of markets to the point it was done in the 80s and 90s).

  • China has generated wealth for many to the point they likely have the largest middle class on the planet in terms of sheer numbers, and in quality of life indicators such as average life expectancy, China has overtaken the US. They also achieved the largest poverty alleviation campaign in modern history.

This is not to say that China is a perfect country with a spotless human rights record or anything like that, it's to say that we can learn from what they've achieved and take our blinders off. And it's pretty ironic that your meme lines up with that in certain aspects.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›