this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
80 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

48344 readers
492 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Considering switching away from Fedora and to another distribution. Does anyone have any suggestions for distributions I should consider?

(page 3) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] potajito@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Endeavour os with kde! Used to run manjaro and I think it's a good stepping stone, so you know what you like and not, what to keep... For example, I didn't know about oh my zhs and p10k, and if it wasn't for manjaro I wouldn't have know about that and owils be running the default bash console.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm old too :-/

  • CP/M DOS Windows3, 95, 98 BeOS some Debian and Mandrake Windows XP Ubuntu (a long time) Mint/Cinnamon (I hated it, it was quick, maybe a year) MX/Xfce (since ~2016)

I may try Arch on a old laptop just to play with it.----

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I hated it, it was quick, maybe a year.

I think we have a very different definition of quick, my friend. I've been on Linux for about a year and a half, most of which on Arch and recently on NixOS.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

CP/M. Ya got me there. I guess I can say EOS though ( Coleco ADAM ) and Tandy DOS 2.1.

If you don’t want to jump straight into Arch, give EndeavourOS a go. It is only 20 packages on top of the 90,000 you get in Arch ( so, it is Arch ) but it is a breeze to install and is sensibly configured out of the box. Once installed, it is Arch ( don’t let the elitists tell you it isn’t ). It uses the real Arch repos and runs the real Arch kernels. Of course, if you have the time, vanilla Arch may be even more fun.

[–] Efwis@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

EndeavourOS with KDE

Same systems as vanilla arch for packaging such as pacman and AUR

Archwiki instruction work without modification

Great forum community without the incessant RTFM

[–] greyfrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Used Arch for over 5 years. I don't know if having a child changed me but I realised I'd lost a lot of time I had that I spent just fiddling with configs to get stufftpo my liking so went from Arch xmonad to PopOs and Gnome.

It has been stable and doesn't have the snap bullshit that comes with Ubuntu.

[–] wviana@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 year ago

You wouldn't need too much config for arch and gnome.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Zorin OS. No muss, no fuss. I've been wanting to hop to Endeavor or Pop! just to do something different.

I mainly play games and watch movies.

[–] happyhippo@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago
[–] frap129@lemmy.maples.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Arch for the last 8ish years. I'm interested in switching to something immutable and with a declarative package manager, but every time I try something else I end up back on arch. It works and has all the packages I use ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] wolandark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] eleanor@social.hamington.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been switching between Arch and Debian for the past 5ish years. I don't really notice much of a difference, other than Arch has updates much more often than Debian Testing usually does. I like how meta-packages in Arch are more minimal than the ones in Debian, but that's a very minor thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm also on Fedora and love it, but I'm thinking of switching to OpenMandriva ROME. OpenSUSE's Tumbleweed is another option.

[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For now, it's Debian 12 with KDE Plasma. But I'm really interested in Immutable Systems. I like OpenSuse Kapla, but the KDE Integration is still in alpha. There are still a few shortcomings with the only flatpak approach, like the fact that the Steam Flatpak can't provide smooth wireless controller support because of lacking permissions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harl3k1n@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

blendOS because it gives you access to all the good stuff, including the AUR and even Android apps.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I have been meaning to give a BlendOS a try. VanillaOS as well ( though I kind of want to wait until they rebase on Debian ).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] istdaslol@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Elementary It’s just like Mint but I had way less issues than with any other distros.

[–] xengi@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Arch on everything with a screen. NixOS on everything without.

[–] nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whats a good way to start with nixos? Are there default configs to start from?

Everytime I go to the site to try I postpone for some reason, but mainly apprehension of deviating too mudh from debian base which has been my most used distros.

And how recommended is it to have nix package manager in popos or any debian based?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Markmus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Trisquel GNU+Linux on my Librebooted ThinkPad X200

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›