this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
1547 points (98.4% liked)

News

23364 readers
3613 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vertigo3pc@lemmy.world 241 points 1 year ago (24 children)

As someone who works in the film and TV industry, let me go ahead and say whatever you do in America, whatever industry: you're undervalued, underpaid, and your wealthy executives are getting fat on your hard work while you starve.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

You spelled capitalism wrong. Social market economy makes it a bit better - but yeah earnings through work and capital gains are extremely off balance right now.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] yoz@aussie.zone 103 points 1 year ago

Better they uploaded it on torrent and asked for donations

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm a former musician and record label employee who's been screaming "told you so" for years. I stopped paying attention to the pittance I get in streaming revenue because it impacts my life that little.

I hope the writers get what they're owed, but don't hold your fucking breath

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t understand how streaming isn’t just considered syndication. It seems like a dictionary definition of what it was, even if it didn’t exist when syndication agreements were made.

It’s a rerun of a show on a separate channel/platform. And the writers/actors should get the agreed revenue for it the same as if it were on TMC, nick at night or Netflix b

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should support the actor's and writer's strike. That's what I'll keep bringing up here, do what you can to make things change.

[–] 15liam20@feddit.uk 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have been supporting it. I haven't starred in a single Holywood movie since it began and I haven't written shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zana@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What can we do? I don't live by anywhere they are striking.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's small, but just talking about it and send a message of support on social media is appreciated.

Maybe they'll even actually see it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When are people going to understand that what you know, what you can do, value, truth, integrity and love have absolutely nothing to do with how much you get paid? The world makes much more sense if you stop assuming being a good person makes you rich. The opposite is true, being a psychopath is far more profitable.

If we placed the appropriate value on the people who reduced suffering the most, there would be statues of Edward Jenner everywhere and he would have been the richest person in the world.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is an inverse relation between the wage a job pays and the contribution to society that the job makes, with a few exceptions like doctors. The highest paying jobs are very often parasites on society. This seems to originate from the Calvinist work ethic where meaningful work is its own reward.

~ paraphrased from David Graeber, Bullshit Jobs

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Most doctors aren't paid enough either, and the supply of doctors is kept low to keep the price of care high, the cost of becoming a doctor is inflated by, among other things, the amount of residency programs available is limited making them very expensive to get into.

The whole thing is engineered to extract wealth, not functionally deliver a supply of goods and services to those who do work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkblue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact that I had to look up who Edward Jenner was, and that I (unfortunately) immediately know who Kylie or Bruce Jenner is (to use the same last name), cynically proves your point.

Nurses and firemen should drive lambos, bankers should eat scraps. But alas, human nature rewards greed, but expects humanity.

[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Gross. Writers should be paid fairly.*

Edit: Previously read "Shame on Neflix". See thoughtful reply below.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

While I don’t disagree with the general state, I don’t see how it’s Netflix. They didn’t produce or create Suits, nor were the initial broadcaster, so the contracts were set long before Netflix

[–] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

How streaming doesn't count as broadcasting is a tad too convenient for the studio to not be a deliberate loophole. Even when the language is tested in court the lobbyism favors the deep pockets asking to split hairs clearly in bad faith.

[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Ha, I didn't understand that, but now I do. Thanks. And agreed that the general state is a shame. Writers deserve to be paid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago

"It's Free Money" ~ Studio Executives

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If all content (all content) was paid for by tax dollars, it would not only be ad free, but there wouldn't be huge companies standing in-between the artist and the consumer as far as getting the artists paid. And it wouldn't cost that much. Like less than what you pay for having all streaming services simultaneously.

https://youtu.be/PJSTFzhs1O4

[–] SirShanova@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But imagine the controversy a government would receive broadcasting various kinds of content. People deride the BBC as a mouthpiece of whichever party is in power despite immense work making it as impartial as possible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ElBarto777@reddthat.com 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What a weird measure of time for a show. It's not a song. Why not use something more suitable, like views?

Edit: it's 50 million hours. If each episode is about an hour long, then that's about 50 million views. If there are 10 episodes per season, then that's 5 million viewers per season.

[–] sickday@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s semantics, but the equivalent for a song would be plays. I think the problem with using views or plays for a metric like this is that they don’t account for people that take in the entire piece of media. It considers people that accidentally click an episode and then close it after some seconds, and people who watch an episode from start to finish, to be the same. One of those people are going to see a lot more ads than the other, thus making the company more money. Just my hypothesis tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›