this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
70 points (94.9% liked)

Privacy

31323 readers
879 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] waywardninja@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree that the idea is great but I have yet to find one single address that I need to get to using the osmand app, which kind of makes it useless. It seems incredibly difficult to use.

[–] projectmoon@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because OsmAnd has some serious issues searching for certain addresses. It's not an OpenStreetMaps problem, but an issue with the app. Organic Maps is better. Magic Earth is even better. Note: only talking about address searching. OsmAnd still has a ton of other useful features.

If I need to use OsmAnd, sometimes I'll copy the plus code from Google Maps, as that translates to GPS coordinates.

[–] waywardninja@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Sure it could be the app not going to deny that. It does feel like the app has so much to offer but it's difficult to use. I have heard Magic Earth is good but since this is the privacy community I didn't mention it or compare it to osm since it's not FOSS.

Copying codes from one source into osmand still breaks your privacy though because your using Google so might as well continue using Google. I'm not super paranoid or anything but for privacy sake I'd say unless I can contain my use case to the app (and osm) it doesn't work out.

I hope the entire movement grows 😁

[–] palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

are there any OSM maps that have the addresses?

[–] MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can see the addresses in Osmand but can't search them in the app IMG_20230811_081630_550

[–] palitu@lemmy.perthchat.org 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, you are right, I guess I just look on the map once I have found the street, knowing approx were it is

[–] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Organic maps lacks a lot of features.

[–] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I agree, but I'd say it meets the needs of most users. Anyone that needs additional features should try osmand.

[–] pietervdvn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Some shameless advertising: there is an OpenStreetMap-community on lemmy: !openstreema0@lemmy.ml

[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is there a way to make it pull some data on road closures from google maps? There's a lot of construction on my way to work right now so I rely on google maps to pick the fastest routes, which it does well. OSM just doesn't have the data to do that.

[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OSM is just map data. No navigation. You can add any routing engine, the problem is, google does not share that data.

[–] gutter564@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Osmand can't use google data because its proprietary.

What I do is I just give myself extra time to get to my destination.

[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With osm I take the shortcuts that are not on google.

[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I was hoping it could be scraped somehow, but yeah, that's very non-trivial for something like maps.

[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I'll stick with stable

[–] EyesEyesBaby@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Testflight = free in app purchases

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No, OsmAnd is pretty bad. Data presentation makes it feel like something out of 1960-s.

[–] aard@kyu.de 9 points 1 year ago

As somebody who also uses paper maps for hiking still: I find google maps got a lot worse over the years, and is pretty much unusable for just looking at maps, while osmand provides easily readable maps.

[–] library_napper@monyet.cc 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you just dont know how to use a map. Google maps is horrible to anyone who wants to actually use it like a map.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago
[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is clunky and takes tinkering to get it just right for each use case, which can be a pain especially for new users. But once it's set up it works very well and most importantly works everywhere. While traveling abroad without cell data OsmAnd saved our asses more than once when Google Maps failed!

It's like Call of Duty vs Arma. Call of Duty is slick and is very good at a very specific experience. Arma isn't nearly as smooth or pretty, and it has a learning curve but once you get past that it can do a wide variety of amazing things the other simply cannot match.

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

At least it has a great and well recognizable name!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

To each their own I guess