“The warrant was appropriate based upon the facts,” it said.
Maybe they should only use it on white dudes.
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
20 readers
4 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 2 years ago
We shouldn't have let this dystopic surveillance shit happen in the first place
Were people given a choice in the first place? It has been pretty much thrust upon people across the world by capitalist overlords and political leaders.
That's exactly the issue here. We did not vote on this. (at least here in the US)
"Detective Oliver stated in detail in her report what she observed in the video footage, and there was no mention of the female suspect being pregnant," the lawsuit says.
You would think this would be your first indication. You would think the victim would mention this as an identifying thing, "she was pregnant." You would think the detective would try to pull a recent photograph, or check cell phone records, or anything else to come to a more affirmative conclusion.
You would think, which seems the detective didn't do in this case.
But the computer said it was OK to violate her rights