View Tolerance as a contract. If someone is tolerant of others, tolerate them too. But if someone is intolerant towards others, they don't get to be tolerated either.

[–] John_Coomsumer@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really dont understand how anyone can look at the modern era of politics without a consideration for game theory, it is so useful for resolving these more nebulous or philosophical idea when it comes to thought conflicts. If your 'opponent' is constantly escalating and you arent responding, you are functionally forfeiting. and we all know the fascists are escalating as often and as hard as they can. if you seek peace or de-escalation you have to negotiate, and they wont do that. if you seek neutral ground you have to respond with equal escalation. and if you want to win you have to apply overwhelming force.

most conflicts in politics are not zero sum like this so its not a useful tool most of the time, but fascists are literally out for the destruction of democracy by definition, its existential by nature.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It gets easier to comprehend when it's tempered by the knowledge of global literacy rates. In the US, for example, 54% of adults read below a 6th grade comprehension level.

More than half the planet can barely analyse the nuances between two similar statements, let alone comprehend anything that takes a formal education to learn. As a result many people lack the communicative skills that enable us to avoid conflict because they literally lack a conceptual understanding of the many words they don't know or understand correctly.

Hell, try even explaining concepts like context and nuance to many people and their eyes glaze over. I'd like to think it's a largely fixable problem due to insufficient education, but another side of me remembers all my classmates in highschool who failed English.

[–] Pandantic@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, you get what you give rule.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

AKA: Fuck around and find out.

[–] CannaVet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

If it's the same writing I'm thinking of I'll try to remember to link it when I get home.

"Tolerance isn't an ideal, it's a contract you're automatically entered into at birth. The contract protects all involved who agree to the contract, but if you break the binds of the contract you are no longer entitled to it's protections. To be intolerant of an intolerant person does not break ones commitment to the contract because the intolerant person is no longer protected by the contract. "

Paraphrased AF