this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
1487 points (100.0% liked)

196

16730 readers
2823 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was a whole bunch of that.

  • Remilitarization of the Rhineland.

  • Anschluß of Austria.

  • The Sudetenland.

  • The actual invasion of Czechoslovakia.

Nazi Germany really pulled "whatcha gonna do about this, bitch?" and got away with it for a surprisingly long time.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Appeasement doesn't work. It did not work out for European powers, it did not work for Stalin, and more recently it did not work with Crimea/Ukraine.

Yet every time a portion of the population will wholeheartedly support appeasement policies out of what I can only assume to be a mix of abhorrent cowardice and a pathological compulsion to submit to authority. I can only imagine the kind of fucked-up childhood these people lived, to make them so afraid of fighting back even when they're the ones holding the bigger stick.

[–] kaonashi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bad comparison. Ireland wasn’t an invading, occupying power. They were trying to reclaim their country from the British empire…and they didn’t even get all of it. I smell a troll.

[–] kaonashi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Britain was an invading occupying power, Ireland gave up the north for peace. It made sense since there was a large British protestant population in the north that feared being integrated with the Catholic south. Very similar situation with the large Russian populations in Crimea and eastern Ukraine that fears integration with the maidan regime.