this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
821 points (100.0% liked)

196

16437 readers
1880 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just hate suffering so much, even the suffering of those deliberately causing suffering. It's a weird philosophical paradox I struggle with and I'm not sure how to resolve it.

[–] RelentlessArts@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well you're better than me because I have definitely relished in the suffering of those who've caused suffering. World needs less of me tbh.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's "better", necessarily. It's partly a protective measure against empathising with people who cause suffering. Because I don't want to suffer.

Aggression against people who cause suffering is a different protection mechanism, and we are both just products of our experiences.

The world needs more people who can engage with self-awareness and evaluating their motives and actions, which you seem able to do. I wish you no suffering!

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Having both types of people is important to a healthy society. The world needs paladins, those willing to wield violence in the pursuit of justice. A society without them would be ripe for strongarming by anyone with a loose set of morals and empty pockets. But we also need people like you, to keep us in check, so that the whole world might not go blind from our eye for an eye.

[–] CountZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not that hard to resolve. In an ideal situation, the fascists would drop dead without feeling anything. I agree that suffering is wrong, but death is natural and comes for everyone eventually.

Also, if you got hit with I gun that big I don't think there would be much time to suffer.

[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Perhaps I should clarify, actively causing death is what I struggle with. At what point does adding to death cause less deaths? How do we determine that? Even if we are able to somehow cause those deaths to be as painless and targetted as possible, it still causes suffering and inspires revenge from their family and friends. Under what circumstances do we justify it?

I haven't found an answer I'm satisfied with yet that doesn't somehow require clairvoyance.