this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
116 points (99.2% liked)

World News

38569 readers
2203 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cartmancarter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

So is the largest contributor to the problem just lack of land? Seems like most of the other problems from the article can be solved with money, but a lack of land makes it hard to build anything

[–] jochem@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I once calculated that if we reduce the land use for livestock by 50% and then use 10% of the newly freed land to build housing (the other 40% can become nature), we can build a city something like 1.5x times the size of Amsterdam, the largest city in the Netherlands.

It's not a lack of land. It's how the land is being used. Almost half is for livestock (or more accurate: to dump the shit of that livestock, as the majority of the animals is kept indoors).

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is the land the livestock are currently using capable of supporting dense housing and is it close to urban cores. Or would you just build sky scrapers in the middle of nowhere, because China tried that and it failed.

[–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything in the Netherlands is close to an urban core.

They also have centuries of experience on building on lands that shouldn't be capable of supporting dense housing. Amsterdam used to be a literal swamp as well (I'm not making any statements on its current status).

[–] rsn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Haha I like your disclaimer, as it was indeed very inviting to reply with a “still a swamp” :)

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So less food, more people? Have you heard the term "famine" before?

[–] rbhfd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The Netherlands exports an enormous amount of meat currently. It's the largest exporter of meat of any EU country. They export 60% of the meat they produce. So yeah, they would be fine.

The Netherlands is currently really suffering from nitrogen pollution, in a big part because of the meat industry. So it would also be a great improvement for the environment to reduce the meat production.

Having such a big part of the European meat production localized in one of the most populated regions in the EU is just a recipe for disaster.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Livestock are incredibly inefficient at producing food. If you use a small fraction of the land to grow crops there will be plenty to eat.

[–] Dohnakun@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Not up to the news of lab-grown meat.

[–] rsn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Less food”? What are you talking about? Most of the land used for livestock is for exported meat. Also, meat is an incredibly unsustainable source of food.

[–] Wander@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

map of land usage in the netherlands

See those red dots? Thats where people live. See the vast vast light green background? Thats agrictulture.

[–] __lb__@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the three biggest contributors are:

  • immigration
  • nitrogen crisis not allowing to have as many houses built as we need
  • seniors living at home longer instead of going to a nursing home
[–] Wander@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The biggest contributor is the massive amounts of land being used for producing meat, which is then exported to other countries

[–] lasagna@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Give this a watch, we most certainly do not lack land.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B8kyrIQCFXQ

Tldr: France could house the entire world in sustainable housing.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=B8kyrIQCFXQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] Rob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t help, but there are a few factors that are more limiting right now. Labour shortage is one, as are nitrogen emissions. A lot of developers also find the current building costs too high.

There are plenty of plots that can be built on, with all of the paperwork good to go.

[–] __lb__@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lack of land

The Dutch: hold my beer

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Global warming: Hold my beer.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Global warming just means we finally have a reason to make higher dykes, our favorite hobby.