Firefox

19035 readers

158 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

Arkenfox VS Betterfox? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I didn't find many comparisons between the two let alone a recent one. So they're both packages for changing Firefox prefs for better performance and or privacy. I'm interested in applying them to Zen Browser. Can you provide detailed comparisons and if I should you use both?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mac@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Personally, I can't get used to the sidebar. I haven't spent all that much time on it.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh, is it impossible to disable?

[–] mac@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago

To be honest, I thought the ux was the appeal of Zen, since if I wasn't going to use that I'd probably use Mullvad browser, or vanilla FF with arkenfox

[–] pory@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can completely disable the sidebar in Waterfox and it's not enabled by default.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, though I was asking about Zen. I can't stand sidebar tabs, haha; too much wasted space and I don't often even view the tab strip relative to merely running searches through it with % .

[–] pory@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ooh. I saw someone respond to you saying you liked Waterfox, with their comment being about disliking the sidebar.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 19 hours ago

Huh, I don't see that comment; got a link? I thought this was about Zen, haha. Too many Fx alts!