this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
1019 points (98.2% liked)

Fediverse

31432 readers
3489 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I apologize if this is old news, but I just noticed it. It looks like Kagi has added Fediverse Forums as a default Web search option.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wolfram@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Not using Kagi because its an American company is valid. But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product. There is still a transaction with a free product.

Kagi is not free because they respect your privacy and don't sell your data.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

I have donated €1500 to opensource software projects and paid a whopping €7 for software. These (privacy respecting) projects got my money because they weren't transaction based. Capitalism is not the only way.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't use them or never read their privacy policy so i don't know. But it's not because it's a paid service that company won't use your data to sell it for more profit. That's EXTRA profit for them, so why the hell not. And them being based in the US means I already can't trust them with their poor privacy laws.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but they don't (their privacy policy is exemplary). They have a whole shpiel about their business model. Just few weeks back they released a feature that makes it technically impossible for them to see who did searches, so no trust is needed anymore. They implemented a very novel protocol, quite cool.

I have doubts considering they are an american company, but I want to see them succeed. Plus, they are remote, so at least a good chunk of the income taxes from salaries are going outside the US.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a shame because there are good American businesses that are affected by this. There are companies that I respect. But it is what it is.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I agree. In general I will personally try to evaluate if the good that comes from a company succeeding outweighs the fact it's a US company. I won't use a dogmatic approach, but I will definitely be careful to choose even more carefully than before.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'd happily pay for search, but Kagi is way too expensive.

10 searches a day, for $5/month? (US)

Like, that is way too much.

I can receive thousands and send thousands of emails per day for that price. Is search really that much more expensive?

[–] shortrounddev@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

Maybe. They use several other indexes as their backend so they have to pay microsoft for every search

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There are plenty of paid products that do not respect your privacy and sell your data.

And there's free products that do respect your privacy and don't make you the product. They are community products.

For instance I offer my bandwidth and storage to thousands of strangers to share torrents and they do the same to me. No secondhand transactions happening.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

But people are too used to products that are free because they make the person using them the product.

That's definitely one model for operating a public service, but its far from the only one.