this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
571 points (98.5% liked)

Atheist Memes

6002 readers
772 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world -5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The OT is in the Christian Bible because they can't ignore it, and shouldn't ignore it. But that doesn't mean following.

An eye for an eye is incompatible with turning the other cheek.

Slavery is entirely a human creation, neither the Bible nor the Torah tells believers to enslave other people but what is says, all from the OT to the NT, is "give to Caesar what's his and give to God what's His", I know it sucks but it's not that different from Stoic teachings, that's why Catholics (and other Christians) belief that suffering makes them closer to God.

Edit.

There is a huge debate in Christendom about the meaning of “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." Some believe the OT rules stand, some believe that they don't. Catholics are taught the OT like kids learn history in school.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Whaaaaaaaa...?? "A human creation?" You can't have it both ways. Either the Bible is the word of God, or it's ALL "a human creation". But allowing for the sake of discussion that God exists, etc, the NT endorses slavery, discusses how to practice it morally, and says nothing to oppose it. The Christian god thinks it's okay for humans to own humans, according to both the OT and the NT; no different than owning a house or livestock.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

What? God gave humans free will. God didn't made slavery, didn't made money, or democracy, didn't made wars. Basically He created the world as it was during paradise and the rest is our creation.

Although I would argue Angels are like slaves but that's not exactly the point of this and at least one rebelled so I don't know to what point they are or were slaves.

[–] Nelots@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Haha no, god explicitly commanded slavery on multiple different instances. That's irrelevant though, as god is the one who created everything knowing how it would turn out with full ability to prevent it, making it 100% his fault. For example:

When God supposedly created Adam and Eve, he had perfect foreknowledge that they would eat from the tree and cause the bullshit that is the fall and original sin. And yet, he still put the tree there. He still put the serpent there. He still gave them access to the tree. He could have chosen not to let any of these things happen, but he didn't.

When a toddler swallows a bottle of poison you've left on the floor, whose fault is it? (Hint: it's not the toddler's, and it's certainly not the toddler's future great great great great great grandchildren's)

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago

God commanded his followers to enslave people multiple times. Here is an introductory article on the topic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery

[–] damdy@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

You're heading towards the problem of evil and determinism. Those topics are way to big for a casual post like this and have been argued for and against for a very long time. I don't this you'll be able to convince anyone of anything here.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Turning the other cheek isn’t incompatible with eye-for-an-eye.

The principle behind eye for an eye justice is that the sentence must fit the crime, instead of brutally excessive. Like cutting off people’s hand for stealing a loaf of bread.

Turning the other cheek doesn’t negate the law, it forgives the consequences of that law. It says “hey, I see you’re starving, here’s a second loaf.”

Incidentally, a man who is starving and the merchant not giving him bread was murder. But details.

Another way of saying it, is that Jesus simplified the law. Because they were too dumb to follow the first ten, Christ gave a simpler set of two:

Love god. Love your neighbor.

This doesn’t negate the 10, but encompasses them.