this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
134 points (95.9% liked)

politics

21655 readers
5403 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meet the New Boss

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't disagree, but it is concerning that they're not doing big, loud, progressive events. Bernie's doing it. He's just one guy. They've got some momentum as a result of the horrifying vacuum that they lost to, but there's a long tradition of them failing to take away the key points.

I feel like the early Harris campaign had it, and then it was removed.

[–] dan@lemmy.i.secretponi.es 12 points 1 week ago

I agree with that.. sort of. They also need to do loud centrist events. Because rags like Politico will 100% run articles saying, "Democrats double down on leftist policies that cost them the 2024 election" without a moment of hesitation.

We know that the far right media gets its talking points from Russia. After watching their disingenuous takes and "anonymous insider" bullshit (e.g., Biden only running for one term was a Politico rumor) I'm convinced Politico is also intentionally sending misleading information into the public conversation.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

but it is concerning that they’re not doing big, loud, progressive events

Martin is more of a highly targeted type of guy, and he's been out there doing stuff

Which makes sense, national level stuff gets lost in the shuffle, the head of one of two major political parties doing a local news circuit to speak directly to where votes matter most is a smarter plan than what Dems have been doing. Regardless of political leaning, that pops up on your radar.

And thats the outreach we desperately need.

Not just soliciting bribes from the wealthy and then running ads on cable TV like it's 1995.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

big, loud,

That's a circus. You're wanting a circus.

Or did you want a calm and orderly progress and planning report from people we pick to manage hundreds of billions in shared resources that we've entrusted in them and asked them to distribute as per our wishes?

I promise, one group looks better on TV and the other looks better on the planet.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

big, loud,

That's a circus. You're wanting a circus.

No? Unless you're calling a warship firing its guns a circus. In which case, yeah.