this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
136 points (99.3% liked)

World News

43782 readers
6299 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sorry, can't do that under capitalism perpetual growth

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

line must go up forever

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I know the left really (and rightfully) hates capitalism, but this isn't a capitalism problem; it's a society problem. You'll always need a certain amount of labor to sustain non-working portions of the populations. Thanks to advances in technology the necessary working person percentage is decreasing but you still can't have the majority of the population be elderly people who will never again be productive.

[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Other system are more stable, Egypt lasted for thousands of years, the Ottoman Empire was fairly stable without growth for a 1000. Capitalism is the the system were part of the profit is reinvested into new machinery 'for efficiency' to undercut competition. Once we do not have competition because there are only 2 or 3 companies (Coke and Pepsi), they fix prices and work to corrupt government to become an Oligarchy. This is why people make the state that we are entering a 'post capital' world.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Egypt lasted for thousands of years,

It's called "ancient Egypt" for convenience's sake, but it's not just one continuous state; it's many states that either succeeded or competed with each other as the country went through cycles of rise, decline, fragmentation and reunification. For a more familiar example think of it as another, much smaller China.

the Ottoman Empire was fairly stable without growth for a 1000.

Uh... No?

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think it's entirely possible if we reduce waste and redistribute wealth. The US pays farmers to NOT grow food to keep the price up. Total insanity.

If wage growth went up at the same rate as GDP, one part time worker could support multiple elderly people.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If wage growth went up at the same rate as GDP, one part time worker could support multiple elderly people

Then prices would have to go up at the same rate, and one part time worker would not be able to support multiple elderly people at a reasonable quality of life. It's not about money; under capitalism money is a shorthand for how much power one has in and over society and isn't directly convertible into useful goods at a constant rate. What you need to be looking at is total productivity, because that's the bottleneck here. If X working people can only make Y things a day and X+Z people need 2Y things a day to survive then a society with X working people and Z non-working people can't survive.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I get what you're saying, but I feel like you are ignoring how much automation has allowed one person to do the work of many in the recent past. If allowed, this should continue to improve.

Edit: by recent past I mean the last 50-80 years.