this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
499 points (94.2% liked)

Comic Strips

15032 readers
3071 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What's wrong with the artist?

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Some people don't like her because she makes a lot of comics that are like, "Haha, I have portrayed myself as the chad and you as the wojak, therefore I am superior!" Without having any actual comedic value. Example 1, Example 2 (both are reddit links, you have been warned).

She also threatened r/bonehurtingjuice with legal action to make them ban remixes of her comics, something not even Stonetoss (the Nazi comic everyone hates) has done.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Don't forget about the comic she made downplaying the seriousness of male r*pe on mens mental health awareness day, and the arguments she participated in under her own post with male victims of SA.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yes, she's a "bitch" because she...posted a comic about the double standards between men and women. irony so thick it could kill you if your skull was any thinner.

I mean, what she posted isn't even that bad. incels and simps get upset about it because they feel personally attacked, and they should.

if you get upset over her comics then you're telling on yourself.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

...did you respond to the wrong person or are you just making shit up to be mad at because you don't have an argument?

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like her comic. It's satire. She doesn't agree with the misandry in the comic, you're supposed to think the women's opinions are wrong. She's on the men's side.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, the comic is satire. The satire is "men getting treated the way female r*pe victims get treated". Implying that male sexual assault doesn't happen or that when it does, people actually believe them, when in reality men who are victims of this often just don't speak up at all because when they are, they're either not believed, called "gay" for not enjoying it, or it ends up reported with a headline like "female teacher has sex with male student".

The fact she posted this comic on men's mental health awareness day and proceeded to engage in arguments with male victims of SA in the comments - who were then banned without a chance to appeal - as well as her past of seeking out her critics to argue with even in other subreddits heavily indicates that this was inflammatory on purpose.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

when in reality men who are victims of this often just don’t speak up at all because when they are, they’re either not believed, called “gay” for not enjoying it, or it ends up reported with a headline like “female teacher has sex with male student”.

Yes, that's how the real world treats male rape victims. This comic is about how fictional misandrists would treat a male robbery victims. Those are two different things. This fiction doesn't make implications about the situation you described.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Reading the responses of the women in the comic you seriously think this situation isnt a metaphor for sexual assault?

In your other thread of replies to me you're stating that it is but we're supposed to disagree with them. I'm not sure why you feel the need to defend her so strongly that you're simultaneously making 2 conflicting arguments and completely ignoring the other behavior I mentioned but I'm not really interested in continuing this discussion with you because I've presented the facts and it's clear you're personally unwilling to consider that this comic was made in bad faith

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they won't respond because there is none.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Receipts have been posted above. Respectfully, I hope more people realize that when someone tries to paint every single one of their critics as being a misogynistic incel, that its a manipulation tactic. (Even though, yes, reddit is full of those too)

I find it really distasteful that she makes comics "in support" of trans people while denying those born as male can experience sexual assault. It's just a different, more subtle/socially acceptable form of transphobia.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sometimes comic artists and other creatives put characters in their works who have bad opinions they disagree with. Pizzacake doesn't agree with the opinion that men can't be raped, she just depicted it in a comic. Depiction isn't the same as agreement. If it was, then George Lucas would be a Sith and Mary Shelley would be an abusive parent.

[–] parmesan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't want to spam the comments section by copy and pasting the same message twice, but someone else made a similar point so I'll link my response

https://lemmy.world/comment/15436914

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago

The people who think men can't be raped are the bad guys. You're supposed to disagree with them. You are having the intended emotional response to the comic. You agree with PizzaCake.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, that sounds positively charming.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I found both examples kinda marginally funny.

Nothing nowhere near anything that would be reason to downvote some other piece of her work, like the one in the OP.

Beyond that, call me old fashioned, but copyright is copyright.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Yep, if they're funny to you, then good for you. I'm not trying to claim that she's objectively bad or anything like that. I'm just explaining why a lot of people don't like her.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago

I liked both comics. I also like bone hurting juice. Fair use is valid.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

What is this shit? Every single time I see this uninspired bullshit-ass half-cocked nonsense it's absolutely nothing. There is no joke here. There is no subtext. There is no comedy. This is just a series of vignettes showing things that wouldn't be interesting if they happened to me. I wouldn't find this engaging if I witnessed it occurring from across the room, and yet this artist has decided it deserved to be committed to MS Paint so that we could all witness their mundane life in perpetuity.

I mean, seriously, is this an NFT-type scam or something? Are they using their Patreon to launder money, and driving upvotes here in order to create the illusion that they could realistically be receiving that much? I just cannot fathom that something so "haha relatable" without the "haha" bit could be generating THOUSANDS of positive interactions.

That was pretty funny.

[–] Darkhoof@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So dine people don't like her because she tells them to piss off? Not a bad reason for me.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

She used to be pretty funny years ago, before she started focusing on hating her haters instead of making actual funny stuff. She started doing things like making a comic she knew would piss off some bigots in the comments, then making another comic (or a few) making fun of the people that hated on her to farm karma from the people who saw the original comic. Some people like that. It's just a bit too toxic for me. I blocked her account a long time ago, so idk what she's making these days.

Some people hate anything they perceive as popular, even within a niche.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you look at the subject matter she covers, it's typically very safe, middle of the road stuff, at least considering her fan base, see MAGA BAD here as an example.

As a result, her comics are very middle of the road, bland and unimaginative.

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If "maga bad" is an uncontroversial take, then how come Donald Trump is the president?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

at least considering her fan base

Do read the entire comment, yeah?

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Right, so when Bernie Sanders says socialism is good, that's a bland "middle of the road" take given his fan base?

If so, what even is the criticism supposed to mean?

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It's annoying how often political comics aren't funny at all. They're just bile. I guess some people find it affirming? I always just roll my eyes when I see this stuff, even when I agree with the message.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Probius answered your question for me