this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
500 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

13166 readers
877 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If we could make Jupiter a black hole, would that be stable enough to not radiate away? Other big body we have access to is the sun and I feel we would suffer more side effects of turning that into a hole compared to Jupiter

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Should we be making any of these things a black hole?

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Replacing Jupiter with an equally massive black hole shouldn’t make a difference. We’d only have one bright dot less in the night sky.

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sun is debatable, since I think we already use it's photons both for photosynthesis in plants, heat (although we could get infrared warmth from the hole) as well as other benefits

Why shouldn't we holify Jupiter? It would be a testament to our technological progress as well as helping us study black holes "close"ish by rather than in labs

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sometimes our technological progress makes us do things we think are a good idea at the time. Then like years, decades, centuries, millennia later we realize it was not such a good idea after all.

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Scientists care too much about if we could, they forget to ask if we should.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure if we made Jupiter a black hole we'd throw off our orbit and have much bigger problems.

[–] mbfalzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn't a Jupiter-mass black hole have the same gravitational effects as Jupiter and absolutely nothing would be affected?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you were very, very close to it, not exactly, since Jupiter's mass is more spread out, making the gravitational pull slightly weaker at close range. But for practical purposes yeah nothing would change for us other than space debris being flung around it instead of hitting it.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

My point was more that we'd probably have to increase the mass to be able to make it a black hole, as we don't have the ability to compress it to a singularity.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Black holes aren't vacuums, nothing would change if the mass was equivalent

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, but you'd more than likely have to increase the mass of Jupiter to make it a black hole.