this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
55319 readers
394 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hmmh. I mean you often get mixed results on virustotal. But in this case most of the positives say it's a "hacktool' or "patcher". I'd say if it did harm to your computer, it would be in some different category. I'd say the name suggests the majority agrees that it's circumventing the copy protection, and that's the bad thing about that file.
Maybe someone else has some more helpful insight. I'm one of the Linux guys here and I don't really pirate application software. But I don't think we have any good alternative for photo editing, at least not with a similar workflow.
I use Linux too on a secondary computer, and I do find amazing the amount of incredible open-source / free apps you can find. I have started using LibreOffice instead of (pirated) microsoft office because I honestly think it's just better.
But yeah, unfortunately, I haven't been able find a lot of free and open-source programs that can replace what this one does. And I just don't like adobe.
Fair enough. Yeah, we have a lot of very good Free Software tools available. But picture editing is kind of a tough one. Always has been.
GIMP can be good, but it's work-flow is almost entirely different, so it's a learning curve. It doesn't help that it looks more like Photoshop these days, so people can think it has similar workflow and then quickly be flummoxed as to how to do something that was simple in Photoshop.
Hmmh. I mean for me it's kind of the other way round. I've started with GIMP because it was free. Never saw any reason to buy Adobe software (or others) and then also invest the time to learn how to use it. I roughly know where to find things in GIMP and don't know any other workflow. But I don't do much photo editing, so I wouldn't really know. And even as an amateur the nagivation in GIMP often feels cumbersome, and sometimes you fail to grasp how you're supposed to do something. I always hoped we'd invent another big photo editing suite as Free Software. Or GIMP would do a complete overhaul. But it is how it is. I mean I don't really care. But just because I don't need a lot of photo editing in my life 😉 It's likely an entirely different story for a lot of other people, and I can relate to that.