this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39534 readers
3163 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/52306691

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Dima's reply caught most of your questions.

Like if they were forced to come from opposite side instead of did the full go around or if it was pilots choice.

They may have been losing power or thrust, or had another problem that basically told them "get on the ground ASAP". And this change in status could have happened after the go-around was initiated. Also if there is not a significant tailwind a plane can land from either direction. It was likely a number of factors that lead to this decision

Is that normal?

Yes

Why are they so angry about the concrete barrier,

Runway overruns happen from time to time. A concrete barrier in the overrun area is the equivalent of have a 90° curve on a motorway/highway with a reinforced wall beyond the curve. Bad design and destined for a fatal accident

To build on Dima's excellent reply, the majority of runways are designed to be approached from either direction. Runway numbers are assigned based on a clockwise 360° radial, dropping the first number. An airport with a runway oriented at 10° East of North would be Runway 1. This airport will have Runways 1 and 19, but they're be the same runway approached from the north or the south.

There's a few things that are weird about this particular incident. Even if there was a full loss of power (indicated by the FVR losing power) the landing gear can be deployed by gravity drop. If there was a full loss of thrust from the get-go, they wouldn't have attempted a go-around. Here's my armchair hypothesis:

Bird strike. Loss of thrust on an engine, possible warnings to shut down the engine. Mayday mayday mayday. Attempted landing (full of fuel, likely overweight) comes in too fast or too high, or both. Go-around initiated. During climb, loss of power in second engine, but still some thrust. Announce intention to land on opposite runway. Decide to wait as long as possible to deploy landing gear in an attempt to increase glide slope. Second engine dies, total power loss. Complete task saturation means they don't/can't attempt a memory item dual engine failure checklist, which would include turning on the Auxiliary Power Unit or Ram Air Turbine to restore some power. (RAT should deploy automatically but perhaps it happened too fast to make a difference, also I'm guessing on the checklist, I'm not a pilot). Power loss means gear must be deployed manually. (Alternatively, with task saturation, they just forgot to deploy gear, and power loss was late and just another scoop on the shit Sunday they were served) Still coming in too high/fast, they touch down late, and overweight, and without braking action from the gear, and with no reverse thrust. They overshoot the end of the runway. For a belly landing, it was perfect. Wings level, no rolling, coming down the center line of the runway. Probably survivable for at least some. Then they hit a concrete barrier

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The concrete barrier (a cinderblock wall) is at both ends of the runway. It goes all the way around the airport.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Yikes.

The RESA should absolutely have engineered arrest materials at the end of the runway. And breakaway towers for the ILS antenna