this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
1059 points (98.9% liked)

196

16800 readers
1935 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

if we halve 6 and two third million Bobs carbon emissions per year it would do as much as getting rid of shell.

shell would probably rather kill 3.3 million Bobs per year than cease to exist.

both strategies have compelling arguments.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I’m def no math person, but wouldn’t it take like 70x-800x that? Because halving the yearly emissions of someone who emits 15 metric tons in their entire lifetime vs the company emitting 50 MILLION tons every single year?

It’s early and I’m typically very bad at math, so maybe I’m wrong