politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Worse, I believe you have a comprehension problem.
Multiple great wins for their citizens, with universal healthcare, a great aerospace lineage, reliable and low cost energy to help their industries grow, low to no cost higher education. A robust, healthy farm industry, high regard for planetary health among citizens, and a very reasonable work-life balance.
All they had to do was demand it. You're too chickenshit to even dream about it. Pathetic.
You could say the same about quite a few countries, without the 80 years of fuckery.
So no I don't want to fight your war. It's a stupid idea that only those who've never seen war would come up with. How about instead of calling a combat veteran a coward you try something else first. This country has tried nothing in regards to political reform platforms and you want to jump straight to violence like it's going to be a fucking Hollywood movie. The only thing you're buying is shit and blood. Then you get to find out that war drives people to strongman leaders because they just want the fighting to be over. They don't care about rights or anything like that after years of fighting. It's honestly a fucking miracle France turned out that way.
And it's a bit weird you keep focusing on them instead of other success stories like Scandinavia or South Korea. None of them required a long period of struggle to realize those things.
You never heard of the Korean war? How much quiet fighting Scandanavian countries went through with the USSR, never mind the 11 wars Sweden and Russia have been in? None of that influenced economic and cultural decisions over the course of history? Really?
I'm also not a warhawk, and would prefer to build society as the engineer I am, not to fight. But our common enemy is wealthy, and motivated to destroy the planet by a mental disease they won't admit to. I'd rather not be violent, but it draws inexorably towards us, we cannot make decisions halfway through collapse.
Enjoy your stolen valor, served alongside a well-broiled cut of historical ignorance 🙄
We're not talking about every war France has been in. We're talking about their internal struggle. And South Korea's liberalization happened in 1987 after massive protests filled the street.
If you want to call other people ignorant then you really should go read about the subjects here before you so happily resign yourself to a lifetime of war. I don't know how old you are but every war hawk I've ever listened to used that same exact line. "I want peace but the violence is just unavoidable!" Every. Fucking. Time. From Kipling to Bush.
Yet here we stand in the mire, and nothing changes. The consequences of inaction will be real.
It's been fun, I don't give a shit about you or convincing you. We'll make moves for team human in spite of folks like you who keep hoping things will improve.
Oh it's war for team human now. I'd say that's a new one but it isn't. George Bush used that one in 2002.
Yep. Not war, more like excision.
ouch, you had at least a resemblance of an argument till the excision remark. War and battles aren't operating tables, ask anyone who has actually participated in a war and ask if that's possible. I doubt you would find a sane general in history who tells you combat is a precise procedure, it's messy and everyone gets hurt.
Oh I meant more like remove the CEOs and the surrounding structures. Doesn't even have to be violent.
Oh gotcha, too used to extremist civil war comments I guess lol so I apologize. I'm a huge proponent for Co-ops so I definitely get your thinking. It's one of the more peaceful paths I hope everyone gets into. Unions only work so far unless legislation gets involved (or things tend to get dicey and you're constantly battling a company daily).
I honestly believe that co-op communities that involve residency and occupation (separate entities though) is one of the only ways to protect yourself from capitalism, it's kinda crazy it hasn't worked on a large scale yet but I imagine competition both economically and policy wise tend to shut things down pretty quick if capitalism sees itself losing a foothold. Something like Land-o-Lake's company running in a town like the Bronx co-op city. Could have a whole slew of member owned companies servicing the area (food,transportation,etc), even have a Co-op that helps other co-ops come to fruition like a credit union (also a co-op) gives out loans.
It's all there, just no clue why it hasn't been implemented before. Got really heavy into researching and designing a small community area like a self-sustaining village that emphasizes co-op based services. There's been plenty of other examples and ones that exist but always seems to be some weird niche thing instead of just a regular ol' town of people that have different perspectives but can agree personal life shouldn't be a constant economical struggle for everyone. There's some weird gate-keeping or lack of social awareness around alternatives, both from mainstream and individuals so I don't get it.
No worries, I was saying violence is an answer if things get too far, but co-ops are much preferred, having done some electrical work for small ones in the north east. Refreshing to be treated like a human for once.
I think there's a marked lack of education about what they are/how they work, all it takes is one mutton-head to say it's communist and everyone scatters in fear.
Oh another one. You say you aren't a war hawk but damned if that doesn't sound exactly like some bangers from the past.
"It's just regime change"
""They'll be home by Christmas!"
Yep. I'm not ashamed of advocating destruction of the destroyers. Physics doesn't give a fuck, planet's getting too hot.
You're not going to solve the suffering of people under climate change by replacing it with the suffering of war.
I never said that, dummy.
I'm saying we gotta tear down these structures which reward destruction of our planet, oust the execs responsible for making these systems (McKinsey et al), and be prepared to counter armed police resistance as they are against making those changes.
Oh no I know you didn't. You believe you can have all the violence with none of the suffering.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Are you the same person I've been talking with all day?
No longer. Your illogical responses now go to the machine's void.
Enjoy.