this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
-18 points (29.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44272 readers
1509 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Given how AI is already polluting the water of literary works, I'm likely never going to read a new book for quite some time, but will just pursue books before 2010.

Is 2010 a good cutoff?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] iii@mander.xyz 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There have always been bad books. There will always be good books. An arbitrary cutoff would only hurt myself.

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel that bad books written by humans is different than books written by AI, and I feel the difference is mostly intent. A bad book might have been written with the best of intentions. A generated book, not so much

[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you find value in the book, it doesn't matter who wrote it. Now... author reputation is a good metric, if a AI is consistently pumping out good books... then its time to welcome the robot overlords.

Asking other people you trust for recommendations is a great starting point.

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, but trusting people on the internet is now becoming harder than ever. Measuring the merit of someone's words is no longer enough if they're being paraphrased by some tool with a later intent to either spy on you or sell you products.

My Convoluted Logic: Sure I could reach out to my network of real people, but not many share the same interests as me. I feel that if someone online who expresses the same tastes as myself does turn out to be an AI, then the minimum amount of damage it could do to me in shilling a book would be one written by a human before the AI was conceived. This is what I mean by a minimum cutoff year

[โ€“] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You could start by switching from strangers to friends.

Strangers on the internet have always been unreliable. AI just adds to the stench.

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You could start by switching from strangers to friends

count the number of downvotes of this post submission plus my abrasive attitude in this comment and tell me how likely that is to happen

[โ€“] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That just proves my point though

The down votes are from internet strangers

I'm an internet stranger

Friends would presumably be people who share in your interests and outlooks and so would be willing to help you figure such things out. At least mine are.

[โ€“] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

My friends are good fun people, but our interest overlap is quite small. I've historically found myself learning more about my interest from internet strangers, than from irl friends.

[โ€“] jet@hackertalks.com 7 points 2 days ago

People you trust, in real life, is a good start