this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
1559 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

58164 readers
3805 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A search for Threads content on Twitter currently brings up zero results, despite plenty of links to Meta’s microblogging rival being posted on the platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But, I really hope this twist of fate of how he accidentally bought Twitter in the first place helps people learn the lesson about all that "free speech" they were whining about. Your speech is not free when it is moderated by a corporation. Yes, the constitution allows you to say what's on your mind, but it does not tell media corporations that they must allow you to say whatever is on your mind. If the uneducated people haven't caught on yet, they shall never catch on, which really might mean stupid is just stupid, no matter how much education you throw at it.

[–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's not even that, free speech is about the government, not private entities, it's about not being arrested for what you say, it has nothing to do with what private companies do on their platforms, they're free to do what they want and they're not limiting any free speech by doing so because they're not the government.

It's baffling how many people still don't understand that and go on crying about free speech related to private entities.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the constitution allows you

I thought the point of the constitution was that it confirms existing rights, not allows or forbids something. While the usual laws do allow or forbid.

Free speech in the web was really funny in the 00s, when moderators could partake in long discussions about it, and then just ban somebody for looking at them wrong (figuratively).

[–] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, wording isn't precise. welcome to the internet. if you didn't get my point because I used the wrong terms, that's OK. You'll live. In my free time I'm not going to vet every single friggin' word I use on an internet forum and edit what I say. I have other things to do.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad you do, it's just that many people don't get this very important difference. If this wasn't important for your message, then fine.

[–] FinalBoy1975@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wasn't important to my message. My message is clear without your nit picking. The words I used were fine. Use a friggin' dictionary. Your "corrections" do not change my message.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Just take your pills and have some tea, will ya?

You're the only person knowing for sure whether they change your message. Others may interpret it in various ways.