UK Politics

3159 readers

234 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

426

British journalist could face years in prison for refusing to hand over his passwords to the police (www.ilfattoquotidiano.it)

submitted 5 days ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It is an unprecedented case. And it risks triggering an unprecedented threat to journalism. The UK police have repeatedly tried to obtain the passwords to the phones of the British independent journalist, Richard Medhurst, the first reporter arrested in London under Section 12: his analyses and comments on Israel’s bloodbath in Gaza – which Amnesty International has characterised as genocide – have been interpreted by the police as support for organisations banned from the UK, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

The British journalists’ union, the NUJ, and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) publicly condemned his arrest and the use of anti-terrorism laws against journalists “simply for carrying out their work”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Medhurst is not necessarily pro Assad, moreso anti Israel and US imperialism. A big motivation I heard him speak on was the Arab spring which was hijacked by the US to install dictatorships all over MENA.

And the assassination of Gadaffi which would bring so called freedom but served US interest and destroyed Libya.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

He's definitely pro-Assad. He's consistently said sanctions against Assad-led Syria need to be lifted, lied about humanitarian aid from the west not being sent to Syria (it has), denied that Assad's government used chemical weapons on their own citizens (they provably did), and said that Assad's government was democratic (lol), secular (lol), and welcoming to all people (lol), whereas the new government is evil. He also said that in kicking out Assad they had chosen to become subservient to Israel and NATO – a position not only completely absurd and pro-Assad, but also dog-whistling the conspiracy theory that Jews are controlling the world.

Medhurst just looks to what western nations think and supports the opposite, regardless of whether they're right or wrong. He's a misinformation spreader literally paid by Russia and Iran (through his work for RT and PressTV). He's no journalist. He's a tankie.

But like I said, I do believe he should have the right to keep his password to himself if he desires. Doing so should lead to no extra charges.

E: I know Lemmy has a serious tankie problem, but come on. Support of Assad too? Really, Lemmy? Sometimes you're worse than Reddit.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

He also said that in kicking out Assad they had chosen to become subservient to Israel and NATO – a position not only completely absurd and pro-Assad, but also dog-whistling the conspiracy theory that Jews are controlling the world.

Not that his position is right or defensible in any way, but saying "become subservient to Israel" when talking about the Middle East isn't a dog whistle; it's just a (true or not otherwise) statement of fact. Saying they're subservient to America would be more accurate, but a number of Arab states can, in fact, be described as subservient to Israel