this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
409 points (97.2% liked)

196

16746 readers
2731 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For context: https://sh.itjust.works/post/29595487 https://lemm.ee/post/50197116

(actual life-ruining gambling is okay though, as long as you give the slot machine a thematic paint job)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago

They're not interested in reform. This is the system working as intended.

PEGI is an industry trade association like the ESRB and MPAA (for movies). The MPAA realized a while ago that if you have a ratings system setup by the biggest companies in the industry, you accomplish two things:

  • Get government regulators off your back
  • Give independent creators a higher rating to keep them niche

In the MPAA's case, they do give indy films higher ratings, and no, it's not just because indy films have more risque content. That was accounted for by comparing to a popular independent rating system.

The ESRB was started when some members of Congress (Lieberman and Kohl, both Democrats) glanced over at video games and acted like they were ready to pass legislation. That legislation would likely never have survived a First Amendment challenge, but the industry would rather not go through that. Besides, it presents an opportunity to do the second bullet point while looking good to their core customers by doing the first. All the various CEOs call each other up and the ESRB is formed almost literally by the end of the day.

And now we have PEGI doing the same thing.